Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
MM Firesnake up on Christopher Burdett's Blog
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 6388185" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Because killing monsters is fun in the game.</p><p></p><p>Old monsters, middle aged ones, babies. Why does age of monsters matter? This is like saying monster gender matters because men should not hit women. Male, female, or androgynous monsters, who cares?</p><p></p><p>This is a game. Fiction. Nobody actually gets hurt.</p><p></p><p>Saying that creating baby monsters in the game is immoral in our society is the same as saying the game itself is immoral. You are humanizing these fictional creatures.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The real question you should be asking yourself is why you are letting this bother you. What is it about your moral framework such that you find it distasteful for the very existence of fictional baby monsters (assuming that the reason for your POV is that you do find it distasteful and are not just playing devils advocate here)? To me, this POV is not much different than religious people from 30 years ago who thought that playing D&D was worshiping the Devil because D&D had fictional demons and devils in it. Both views seem a bit intolerant based on some moral line that was crossed.</p><p></p><p>You try to put a negative moral connotation on the game designers by even questioning their motivations to create such a fictional monster. Why?</p><p></p><p>It's a game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This infant issue only exists because people like yourself are bringing it up (you did mention it first in this thread).</p><p></p><p>You and D&D girl seem to think this is a relevant and real issue. Most everyone else is looking at you like you grew a third eye on your foreheads.</p><p></p><p>This is not controversial.</p><p></p><p>Today, games are filled with all types of violence. That doesn't make the killing of fictional infant creatures immoral, it only makes it immoral to some small segment of the population. Morality is subjective.</p><p></p><p>If your definition of controversial is that a few people think this way, hence, this topic is controversial, then yes, this topic is controversial. I see it as a non-issue (although a fun one to banter about).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 6388185, member: 2011"] Because killing monsters is fun in the game. Old monsters, middle aged ones, babies. Why does age of monsters matter? This is like saying monster gender matters because men should not hit women. Male, female, or androgynous monsters, who cares? This is a game. Fiction. Nobody actually gets hurt. Saying that creating baby monsters in the game is immoral in our society is the same as saying the game itself is immoral. You are humanizing these fictional creatures. The real question you should be asking yourself is why you are letting this bother you. What is it about your moral framework such that you find it distasteful for the very existence of fictional baby monsters (assuming that the reason for your POV is that you do find it distasteful and are not just playing devils advocate here)? To me, this POV is not much different than religious people from 30 years ago who thought that playing D&D was worshiping the Devil because D&D had fictional demons and devils in it. Both views seem a bit intolerant based on some moral line that was crossed. You try to put a negative moral connotation on the game designers by even questioning their motivations to create such a fictional monster. Why? It's a game. This infant issue only exists because people like yourself are bringing it up (you did mention it first in this thread). You and D&D girl seem to think this is a relevant and real issue. Most everyone else is looking at you like you grew a third eye on your foreheads. This is not controversial. Today, games are filled with all types of violence. That doesn't make the killing of fictional infant creatures immoral, it only makes it immoral to some small segment of the population. Morality is subjective. If your definition of controversial is that a few people think this way, hence, this topic is controversial, then yes, this topic is controversial. I see it as a non-issue (although a fun one to banter about). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
MM Firesnake up on Christopher Burdett's Blog
Top