Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="HardcoreDandDGirl" data-source="post: 6389075" data-attributes="member: 82746">ok...&nbsp;I quoted you... you said whistle blower... I never used that before you...&nbsp;yes you made uo a hypothetical worst case scenero where instead of honest debate helping to shape how things move forward some dire consqunce that you in no way can link to this might happen...I&quot;m not asking for someone to loose there job... I'm asking to talk in a public forum about this and maybe get enough head of steam up to effect change moving forward... &nbsp;um...<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm&nbsp; &nbsp; :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:"&nbsp; data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> is that about a completely different argument?yea... maybe you should take this argument to someone trying to do that and just argue with us about D&amp;D&nbsp;so that half of your post was? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:"&nbsp; data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" />Ok, let me put you at ease... I don't want anyone fired. I would like them to take a different approach from now on though... one where the default is not killing babies, and that the exception is for hunting wyrmlings and firesnakes&nbsp;being called a rabble rouser and a trouble maker and being told my thoughts should not be as represented (aka whole idea die a quick death) is insultingthe author writes a character and you get to interpret that character. Is Fred a hero, a villain or other? Now in D&amp;D instead of writing a character you are playing a roll and living through it your fantasy, and all I want is the default fantasy the game presents to new players NOT to be a baby killerOK, and I will ask for the 5th time, what would be the harm of taking baby monsters out of the default game?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="HardcoreDandDGirl, post: 6389075, member: 82746"] ok... I quoted you... you said whistle blower... I never used that before you... yes you made uo a hypothetical worst case scenero where instead of honest debate helping to shape how things move forward some dire consqunce that you in no way can link to this might happen... I"m not asking for someone to loose there job... I'm asking to talk in a public forum about this and maybe get enough head of steam up to effect change moving forward... um...:erm::confused: is that about a completely different argument? yea... maybe you should take this argument to someone trying to do that and just argue with us about D&D so that half of your post was? :confused: Ok, let me put you at ease... I don't want anyone fired. I would like them to take a different approach from now on though... one where the default is not killing babies, and that the exception is for hunting wyrmlings and firesnakes being called a rabble rouser and a trouble maker and being told my thoughts should not be as represented (aka whole idea die a quick death) is insulting the author writes a character and you get to interpret that character. Is Fred a hero, a villain or other? Now in D&D instead of writing a character you are playing a roll and living through it your fantasy, and all I want is the default fantasy the game presents to new players NOT to be a baby killer OK, and I will ask for the 5th time, what would be the harm of taking baby monsters out of the default game? [/QUOTE]

Verification