Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
MM2 Excerpt: Adamantine Dragon question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mevers" data-source="post: 4753246" data-attributes="member: 49478"><p>The way I read it, it is pretty straight forward.</p><p></p><p>The dragon, as a Standard Action, can make 4 claw attacks and a Bite attack.</p><p></p><p>Nowhere does it say those 4 claw attacks all need to be on the same target. Therefore they can be against whoever the Dragon wishes.</p><p></p><p>The Bite attack can then be made against any other target who was not attacked by the claws.</p><p></p><p>As far as the fighter's (or other defender's) marks, any attack (claw or bite) not targeted at them will take the mark penalty (and associated Combat Challenge etc).</p><p></p><p>The thing to remember is that this is not <strong>ONE</strong> Attack with Multiple Targets, but <strong>FIVE</strong> attacks, each with their own targets. And so they resolve as separate attacks.</p><p></p><p>So yes, no matter what, the Fighter gets one Combat Challenge attack against the Dragon. Might just be better to not target the fighter at all, and take down that squishy standing next to him. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I think the confusion comes from trying to imply too much. I have found generally very little need to imply anything in 4th Edition, especially Monster Stat Blocks. What you can and can't do are usually called out pretty clearly.</p><p></p><p>Besides, making a bite attack against 'a different target' does not at all imply the 4 claw attacks all need to be made against the same target. Just that the bite attack needs to be made against a target not targeted by a claw attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mevers, post: 4753246, member: 49478"] The way I read it, it is pretty straight forward. The dragon, as a Standard Action, can make 4 claw attacks and a Bite attack. Nowhere does it say those 4 claw attacks all need to be on the same target. Therefore they can be against whoever the Dragon wishes. The Bite attack can then be made against any other target who was not attacked by the claws. As far as the fighter's (or other defender's) marks, any attack (claw or bite) not targeted at them will take the mark penalty (and associated Combat Challenge etc). The thing to remember is that this is not [b]ONE[/b] Attack with Multiple Targets, but [b]FIVE[/b] attacks, each with their own targets. And so they resolve as separate attacks. So yes, no matter what, the Fighter gets one Combat Challenge attack against the Dragon. Might just be better to not target the fighter at all, and take down that squishy standing next to him. :) I think the confusion comes from trying to imply too much. I have found generally very little need to imply anything in 4th Edition, especially Monster Stat Blocks. What you can and can't do are usually called out pretty clearly. Besides, making a bite attack against 'a different target' does not at all imply the 4 claw attacks all need to be made against the same target. Just that the bite attack needs to be made against a target not targeted by a claw attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
MM2 Excerpt: Adamantine Dragon question
Top