Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
MM2 Excerpt: Adamantine Dragon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Badwe" data-source="post: 4753418" data-attributes="member: 61762"><p>Ok, so a quick rundown of the basics:</p><p></p><p>*DMG Math recommends the following for a level 22 soldier (thanks to Asmor):</p><p>HP: 1055; Bloodied: 527</p><p>AC: 38 Fortitude: 35 Reflex: 34 Will: 34</p><p>Increase 3 of the 4 defenses (including AC) by +2 each.</p><p>--Stats for an elder red dragon, level 22 solo from MM:</p><p>HP 1050; Bloodied 525</p><p>AC 40; Fortitude 40, Reflex 37, Will 34</p><p></p><p>only a small diff in HP, defenses a bit higher except for AC which could theoretically be spot on.</p><p></p><p></p><p>*Level 21:</p><p>HP: 1010; Bloodied: 505</p><p>AC: 37 Fortitude: 34 Reflex: 33 Will: 33</p><p>Increase 3 of the 4 defenses (including AC) by +2 each.</p><p>--Adamantine dragon from newest preview</p><p>HP 796; Bloodied 398</p><p>AC 37; Fortitude 36, Reflex 33, Will 32</p><p></p><p>HP is _definitely_ low, only fortitude seems to be within the recommended math. for reference, HP*4 would have been even 808, so this creature falls low even on that HP scale. Now let's look at damage</p><p></p><p>*Red:</p><p>+Level 21 recomends: </p><p>Damage Low | Medium | High</p><p>At-will 2d6+8 | 3d6+8 | 4d6+8</p><p>+Claw (Standard, at-will)</p><p>Reach 3; +29 vs Armor Class; 2d10+9 damage.</p><p>+can do 2 claw attacks</p><p>+total is roughly 4d10+18, well above a single High damage point, but well below 5 times that.</p><p></p><p>*Adamantine:</p><p>Damage Low | Medium | High</p><p>At-will 2d6+7 | 3d6+8 | 3d8+7</p><p>+Claw (standard; at-will)</p><p>Reach 2; +26 vs. Reflex; 1d12 + 8 damage.</p><p>+Bite (standard; at-will)</p><p>Reach 2; +26 vs. Reflex; 2d8 + 8 damage, and ongoing 10 damage (save ends).</p><p>+Can do 4 claw attacks, plus 1 bite</p><p>+total of 4d12 + 2d8 + 40, 5 times the low, med, and high would be 10d6+35, 15d6+40, and 15d8+35 respectively, if 1d12 is comparable to 2d6, we could estimate this at will attack being somewhere above 5 times the low end.</p><p></p><p>while it's unrelated to damage, the reach on these is only 2 for an elder (normally is 3). Red has a difference of +3 to hit for only 1 level difference, but as others have pointed out, attacks AC rather than reflex. There are plenty of posts to point out that the difference between AC and reflex is often much more than 3 for anyone with a decent ref.</p><p></p><p>The dragons appear to have comparably sized breath weapons, both recharging on a 5 or 6. both doing 3d12 + some coefficient. Of course, the adamantine dragon also gets a rider effect of 15 thunder damage on the next turn. Besides the raw damage output, this is an interesting way to make the breath weapon change the way a turn unfolds over more than 1 turn.</p><p></p><p>Both dragons appear to have comparable"Frightful presence" moves as well.</p><p></p><p>All told it definitely appears to reflect a change in methodology of solos. The main nagging issue is that the difference between reach 2 and reach 3 DOES appear to be at least partly responsible for the damage descrepency. In all fairness, having extra range SHOULD equate to the red dragon doing less damage. How much though, i couldn't say. The fact that the red's basic at-will is barely beating out the high damage for a SINGLE creature at that level suggests he'd need a bit more, even being a soldier. obviously bringing all that damage to bear on a single player in a single round is part of the reason they can't have a flat x5 multiplier, but things like the adamantine's requirement of the bite hitting someone else seem to hint at some design space that could ameliorate this. </p><p></p><p>For now I'd say the general indication is that you could safely trade 1/5th a MM or Draconomicon dragon's HP for an extra claw attack and some kind of rider, damage or maybe an AC penalty, to the breath weapon and come out with something similar to this new style of dragon. There is a saying in design for Magic: the gathering that dragons are allowed to be strictly better for their casting cost simply because they're dragons and are iconic. It's ok for dragons to be ahead of the curve for a given level range because you expect dragons to be powerful. Of course, you also expect to be able to BEAT the dragon, so tread lightly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Badwe, post: 4753418, member: 61762"] Ok, so a quick rundown of the basics: *DMG Math recommends the following for a level 22 soldier (thanks to Asmor): HP: 1055; Bloodied: 527 AC: 38 Fortitude: 35 Reflex: 34 Will: 34 Increase 3 of the 4 defenses (including AC) by +2 each. --Stats for an elder red dragon, level 22 solo from MM: HP 1050; Bloodied 525 AC 40; Fortitude 40, Reflex 37, Will 34 only a small diff in HP, defenses a bit higher except for AC which could theoretically be spot on. *Level 21: HP: 1010; Bloodied: 505 AC: 37 Fortitude: 34 Reflex: 33 Will: 33 Increase 3 of the 4 defenses (including AC) by +2 each. --Adamantine dragon from newest preview HP 796; Bloodied 398 AC 37; Fortitude 36, Reflex 33, Will 32 HP is _definitely_ low, only fortitude seems to be within the recommended math. for reference, HP*4 would have been even 808, so this creature falls low even on that HP scale. Now let's look at damage *Red: +Level 21 recomends: Damage Low | Medium | High At-will 2d6+8 | 3d6+8 | 4d6+8 +Claw (Standard, at-will) Reach 3; +29 vs Armor Class; 2d10+9 damage. +can do 2 claw attacks +total is roughly 4d10+18, well above a single High damage point, but well below 5 times that. *Adamantine: Damage Low | Medium | High At-will 2d6+7 | 3d6+8 | 3d8+7 +Claw (standard; at-will) Reach 2; +26 vs. Reflex; 1d12 + 8 damage. +Bite (standard; at-will) Reach 2; +26 vs. Reflex; 2d8 + 8 damage, and ongoing 10 damage (save ends). +Can do 4 claw attacks, plus 1 bite +total of 4d12 + 2d8 + 40, 5 times the low, med, and high would be 10d6+35, 15d6+40, and 15d8+35 respectively, if 1d12 is comparable to 2d6, we could estimate this at will attack being somewhere above 5 times the low end. while it's unrelated to damage, the reach on these is only 2 for an elder (normally is 3). Red has a difference of +3 to hit for only 1 level difference, but as others have pointed out, attacks AC rather than reflex. There are plenty of posts to point out that the difference between AC and reflex is often much more than 3 for anyone with a decent ref. The dragons appear to have comparably sized breath weapons, both recharging on a 5 or 6. both doing 3d12 + some coefficient. Of course, the adamantine dragon also gets a rider effect of 15 thunder damage on the next turn. Besides the raw damage output, this is an interesting way to make the breath weapon change the way a turn unfolds over more than 1 turn. Both dragons appear to have comparable"Frightful presence" moves as well. All told it definitely appears to reflect a change in methodology of solos. The main nagging issue is that the difference between reach 2 and reach 3 DOES appear to be at least partly responsible for the damage descrepency. In all fairness, having extra range SHOULD equate to the red dragon doing less damage. How much though, i couldn't say. The fact that the red's basic at-will is barely beating out the high damage for a SINGLE creature at that level suggests he'd need a bit more, even being a soldier. obviously bringing all that damage to bear on a single player in a single round is part of the reason they can't have a flat x5 multiplier, but things like the adamantine's requirement of the bite hitting someone else seem to hint at some design space that could ameliorate this. For now I'd say the general indication is that you could safely trade 1/5th a MM or Draconomicon dragon's HP for an extra claw attack and some kind of rider, damage or maybe an AC penalty, to the breath weapon and come out with something similar to this new style of dragon. There is a saying in design for Magic: the gathering that dragons are allowed to be strictly better for their casting cost simply because they're dragons and are iconic. It's ok for dragons to be ahead of the curve for a given level range because you expect dragons to be powerful. Of course, you also expect to be able to BEAT the dragon, so tread lightly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
MM2 Excerpt: Adamantine Dragon
Top