Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5205367" data-attributes="member: 61155">This is a humor post, right? I've always been rather impressed with your other posts, so I'm assuming this is just sarcasm, yes?  If not.... well, I would really only count a single one of those - the Ogremoch one - as a genuine typo. The rest of those either are accurate as they are, or really aren't something that is needed. The one picture of a Chitine tells you what you need to know for the five versions of it - the rest, you can just describe via different equipment just like you would with humans, or orcs, or elves. The one that does appear different has a description in the entry. That really is all you need. What I am interested in the editors doing is making sure there aren't genuine typos. In making sure the monsters are well-designed and complete. I remember older monster books that were filled with serious issues throughout the stat blocks. Monsters whose entry contradicted itself three times over about the size of the monster. Numbers that were off, or inconsistent, or otherwise flawed.  If MM3 doesn't have those, then the editors have done their job. If the only typos in the book are the ones you have turned up, then I'll consider this book a rousing success! All that said, if this post was genuinely sarcasm, then... congrats, ya got me. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification