Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mmmm...Libris Mortis.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PeterDonis" data-source="post: 1804677" data-attributes="member: 6906"><p>OK, now I see where you were coming from. My degree is in Nuclear Engineering, so I spent a lot more time looking at subatomic particles than at whole atoms and molecules; that's probably why I came at this from a different slant. Here's how I would interpret the references you cited:</p><p></p><p>The references didn't mention the motions of subatomic particles because in almost all real-world cases they're not relevant--since, as you point out, we don't know any way of extracting whatever "extra" energy is still in them. However, if there is any way of extracting such energy from *any* particles in the system, whether it's nucleons in the nucleus or electrons orbiting the nucleus (I don't think they're moving at the speed of light in their lowest energy state to begin with--photons, yes, electrons no--but in any case if they're in their lowest energy state within the atom then by definition you can't extract any more energy from them), then the system isn't truly at absolute zero. The definition of absolute zero is that *no* further energy can be extracted at all, from any part of the system, by any process whatever.</p><p></p><p>If we don't yet know of a process to extract more energy from some system, we may *think* it's at absolute zero; but if we discover such a process in the future, that doesn't show that we can now cool something below absolute zero; it just shows we were wrong in thinking the system was at absolute zero before.</p><p></p><p>Edit: The following article in the Usenet Physics FAQ goes into more detail about the viewpoint I'm taking here; it gives a more general definition of temperature than "average kinetic energy of particles", which is the one you used, and explains how negative temperatures work.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/neg_temperature.html" target="_blank">http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/neg_temperature.html</a></p><p></p><p>P. S.: Saw the press release for your new gaming company. Good luck! I look forward to taking a look at your products; if they're anything like the stuff already on your website I'll probably be a customer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PeterDonis, post: 1804677, member: 6906"] OK, now I see where you were coming from. My degree is in Nuclear Engineering, so I spent a lot more time looking at subatomic particles than at whole atoms and molecules; that's probably why I came at this from a different slant. Here's how I would interpret the references you cited: The references didn't mention the motions of subatomic particles because in almost all real-world cases they're not relevant--since, as you point out, we don't know any way of extracting whatever "extra" energy is still in them. However, if there is any way of extracting such energy from *any* particles in the system, whether it's nucleons in the nucleus or electrons orbiting the nucleus (I don't think they're moving at the speed of light in their lowest energy state to begin with--photons, yes, electrons no--but in any case if they're in their lowest energy state within the atom then by definition you can't extract any more energy from them), then the system isn't truly at absolute zero. The definition of absolute zero is that *no* further energy can be extracted at all, from any part of the system, by any process whatever. If we don't yet know of a process to extract more energy from some system, we may *think* it's at absolute zero; but if we discover such a process in the future, that doesn't show that we can now cool something below absolute zero; it just shows we were wrong in thinking the system was at absolute zero before. Edit: The following article in the Usenet Physics FAQ goes into more detail about the viewpoint I'm taking here; it gives a more general definition of temperature than "average kinetic energy of particles", which is the one you used, and explains how negative temperatures work. [url]http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/neg_temperature.html[/url] P. S.: Saw the press release for your new gaming company. Good luck! I look forward to taking a look at your products; if they're anything like the stuff already on your website I'll probably be a customer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mmmm...Libris Mortis.
Top