Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Modeling Uncertainty
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ClearlyTough69" data-source="post: 7007428" data-attributes="member: 6864123"><p>First, the <strong>diplomatic </strong>guard.</p><p></p><p>The guard is telling the truth, so it's a contest between the character's Insight and the guard's trustworthiness, represented as a -5 Diplomacy check (the inverse of his Diplomacy modifier).</p><p></p><p>The character's check result is 8 (natural 3, +5 Insight). As we've already established, the guard's check result is -5. On the face of it, the character detects that the guard is being truthful; her degree of success is 13 (8 - -5).</p><p></p><p>Assessment = d20 + degree of success OR - degree of failure</p><p>In this case = natural 4 +13 = 17.</p><p>This meets the threshold of 10, so the character makes an accurate assessment of the outcome of the check: she <em>believes </em>the guard is being truthful.</p><p></p><p>Confidence = d20 + degree of success/ failure</p><p>In this case = natural 12 +13 = 25.</p><p>This exceeds the threshold for absolute certainty, so the DM reports that the character is <em>absolutely certain that the diplomatic guard is being truthful</em>.</p><p>___________________</p><p></p><p>Now, the <strong>undiplomatic </strong>guard, whom nature has gifted with a shifty demeanour.</p><p></p><p>This guard is also telling the truth, but with a Charisma of 5, his trustworthiness can be represented as a +3 Diplomacy check (the inverse of his Diplomacy modifier).</p><p></p><p>The character's check result is still 8 (natural 3, +5 Insight). As we've already established, the guard's check result is 3. On the face of it, the character detects that the guard is being truthful; her degree of success is 5 (8 - 3).</p><p></p><p>Assessment = d20 + degree of success OR - degree of failure</p><p>In this case = natural 4 + 5 = 9.</p><p>This does not meet the threshold of 10, so the character makes an erroneous assessment of the outcome of the check: she <em>believes </em>the guard is lying. She has mistaken his unfortunate demeanour as a sign of untrustworthiness.</p><p></p><p>Confidence = d20 + degree of success/ failure</p><p>In this case = natural 12 + 5 = 17.</p><p>This exceeds the threshold for being very sure, so the DM reports that the character is <em>very sure that the undiplomatic guard is lying</em>, when in fact he's being entirely truthful.</p><p>_____________________</p><p></p><p>That seems about right to me. The character's low Insight roll <em>and</em> low assessment roll caused her to think that the shifty guard was lying, but she was mistaken; her comparatively high confidence roll caused her to be unduly confident in her assessment. Most of the time (ie with roughly average rolls) she would quite rightly be certain that the undiplomatic guard was telling the truth. </p><p></p><p>The mechanic does require that all rolls be made and analysed together before a player can learn what his character's perceptions of the situation are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ClearlyTough69, post: 7007428, member: 6864123"] First, the [B]diplomatic [/B]guard. The guard is telling the truth, so it's a contest between the character's Insight and the guard's trustworthiness, represented as a -5 Diplomacy check (the inverse of his Diplomacy modifier). The character's check result is 8 (natural 3, +5 Insight). As we've already established, the guard's check result is -5. On the face of it, the character detects that the guard is being truthful; her degree of success is 13 (8 - -5). Assessment = d20 + degree of success OR - degree of failure In this case = natural 4 +13 = 17. This meets the threshold of 10, so the character makes an accurate assessment of the outcome of the check: she [I]believes [/I]the guard is being truthful. Confidence = d20 + degree of success/ failure In this case = natural 12 +13 = 25. This exceeds the threshold for absolute certainty, so the DM reports that the character is [I]absolutely certain that the diplomatic guard is being truthful[/I]. ___________________ Now, the [B]undiplomatic [/B]guard, whom nature has gifted with a shifty demeanour. This guard is also telling the truth, but with a Charisma of 5, his trustworthiness can be represented as a +3 Diplomacy check (the inverse of his Diplomacy modifier). The character's check result is still 8 (natural 3, +5 Insight). As we've already established, the guard's check result is 3. On the face of it, the character detects that the guard is being truthful; her degree of success is 5 (8 - 3). Assessment = d20 + degree of success OR - degree of failure In this case = natural 4 + 5 = 9. This does not meet the threshold of 10, so the character makes an erroneous assessment of the outcome of the check: she [I]believes [/I]the guard is lying. She has mistaken his unfortunate demeanour as a sign of untrustworthiness. Confidence = d20 + degree of success/ failure In this case = natural 12 + 5 = 17. This exceeds the threshold for being very sure, so the DM reports that the character is [I]very sure that the undiplomatic guard is lying[/I], when in fact he's being entirely truthful. _____________________ That seems about right to me. The character's low Insight roll [I]and[/I] low assessment roll caused her to think that the shifty guard was lying, but she was mistaken; her comparatively high confidence roll caused her to be unduly confident in her assessment. Most of the time (ie with roughly average rolls) she would quite rightly be certain that the undiplomatic guard was telling the truth. The mechanic does require that all rolls be made and analysed together before a player can learn what his character's perceptions of the situation are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Modeling Uncertainty
Top