Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Moderator Elections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="roguerouge" data-source="post: 4157903" data-attributes="member: 13855"><p>First off, let's be clear, I certainly know that nothing's happening without the buy-in of the administrators and owners of this business site.</p><p></p><p>There are four advantages that I can think of right now:</p><p></p><p>1. Voting may increase Community Supporter purchases, as this "new feature" may have a market demand to those community members who have not taken that step.</p><p></p><p>2. Since no one else in the niche market of gaming discussion communities has taken this step, it may provide a market advantage at an especially important time. It could attract new members, of which some would buy Community Supporter accounts. It could lead members to spend more time on the site, which would increase ad revenues. It's at least possible that people who felt stifled at another community might "buy-in" literally to this idea.</p><p></p><p>3. It promotes discussion and the ultimate good and primary service of this site is discussion. Reasoned and interesting discussion attracts viewers, gets them to stay longer, and gets them to click on more pages where ads are seen.</p><p></p><p>4. It provides a safety valve to release social pressure. Rather than act out against the moderators or simply leave, the upset poster now has another option: talk to his or her representative. That may make moderator's work less emotionally stressful, ultimately. People respond better to tough calls when they feel that a fair process resulted in the tough call and that their voice was heard. Those who feel unable to express their choices through the formal system of a vote may be more likely to resist or fail to support decisions made through it.</p><p></p><p>In short, an experiment in limited representation (in some form) may directly increase purchases, may increase ad revenues, may provide a competitive advantage in this niche market at this time, and may ultimately lead to more stability and less moderator stress.</p><p></p><p>That's the goal of all of us on this thread. The question is how to get there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="roguerouge, post: 4157903, member: 13855"] First off, let's be clear, I certainly know that nothing's happening without the buy-in of the administrators and owners of this business site. There are four advantages that I can think of right now: 1. Voting may increase Community Supporter purchases, as this "new feature" may have a market demand to those community members who have not taken that step. 2. Since no one else in the niche market of gaming discussion communities has taken this step, it may provide a market advantage at an especially important time. It could attract new members, of which some would buy Community Supporter accounts. It could lead members to spend more time on the site, which would increase ad revenues. It's at least possible that people who felt stifled at another community might "buy-in" literally to this idea. 3. It promotes discussion and the ultimate good and primary service of this site is discussion. Reasoned and interesting discussion attracts viewers, gets them to stay longer, and gets them to click on more pages where ads are seen. 4. It provides a safety valve to release social pressure. Rather than act out against the moderators or simply leave, the upset poster now has another option: talk to his or her representative. That may make moderator's work less emotionally stressful, ultimately. People respond better to tough calls when they feel that a fair process resulted in the tough call and that their voice was heard. Those who feel unable to express their choices through the formal system of a vote may be more likely to resist or fail to support decisions made through it. In short, an experiment in limited representation (in some form) may directly increase purchases, may increase ad revenues, may provide a competitive advantage in this niche market at this time, and may ultimately lead to more stability and less moderator stress. That's the goal of all of us on this thread. The question is how to get there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Moderator Elections
Top