Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Modern Warfare 2 plot question (spoiler)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jasonbostwick" data-source="post: 5064708" data-attributes="member: 34924"><p>As I interpreted it, Sheperd killed TF141 because they knew or would find out that he had engineered the entire war between the US and Russia. He had used this war to get 'a blank cheque' from the American military and radically increase his personal power.</p><p></p><p>It isn't really presented very clearly (I didn't catch it from my first playthrough), but Sheperd was the commander of the Marine division that died when that Arab city was nuked in the first game. Somehow this is resulted in his nefarious plot, but I'm not really sure what exactly his ultimate goal was.</p><p></p><p>The story was a bit shaky</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As for 'No Russian,' I'm not really sure what I felt about it. The first time through I was a bit hesitant to shoot the civilians because I wasn't really sure what was happening. </p><p>I felt like it would have been a bit more useful to the narrative if there had been some dialogue during the elevator ride up the airport check-in. </p><p></p><p>I think the argument I've read in a few places that the No Russian level mission "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Russian#United_States" target="_blank">draws the morality of war and espionage into sharp focus in a way that simply shooting the bad guys cannot</a>" is a bit bunk. </p><p></p><p>If that was really the goal of Infinity Ward, I think they definitely could have gone a bit further. I thought there was a missed opportunity to deal with the issue of Friendly Fire during the Whitehouse mission. After you pass the tank full of trapped Russians, you come across a group who fails to respond to your hailing (Texas! Come on, say star, say star.....) and they turn out to be Russians.</p><p></p><p>I thought it would have been an excellent bit of the narrative if your group had advanced on their position after the firefight and realised that because of the breakdown in communication you had fired on other Army Rangers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>One thing is for sure, though - Zakhaiev International Airport seems a lot nicer than Sheremetyevo did the last time I was there. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jasonbostwick, post: 5064708, member: 34924"] As I interpreted it, Sheperd killed TF141 because they knew or would find out that he had engineered the entire war between the US and Russia. He had used this war to get 'a blank cheque' from the American military and radically increase his personal power. It isn't really presented very clearly (I didn't catch it from my first playthrough), but Sheperd was the commander of the Marine division that died when that Arab city was nuked in the first game. Somehow this is resulted in his nefarious plot, but I'm not really sure what exactly his ultimate goal was. The story was a bit shaky As for 'No Russian,' I'm not really sure what I felt about it. The first time through I was a bit hesitant to shoot the civilians because I wasn't really sure what was happening. I felt like it would have been a bit more useful to the narrative if there had been some dialogue during the elevator ride up the airport check-in. I think the argument I've read in a few places that the No Russian level mission "[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Russian#United_States"]draws the morality of war and espionage into sharp focus in a way that simply shooting the bad guys cannot[/URL]" is a bit bunk. If that was really the goal of Infinity Ward, I think they definitely could have gone a bit further. I thought there was a missed opportunity to deal with the issue of Friendly Fire during the Whitehouse mission. After you pass the tank full of trapped Russians, you come across a group who fails to respond to your hailing (Texas! Come on, say star, say star.....) and they turn out to be Russians. I thought it would have been an excellent bit of the narrative if your group had advanced on their position after the firefight and realised that because of the breakdown in communication you had fired on other Army Rangers. One thing is for sure, though - Zakhaiev International Airport seems a lot nicer than Sheremetyevo did the last time I was there. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Modern Warfare 2 plot question (spoiler)
Top