Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Modos RPG Playtest 1: the One True System
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GMMichael" data-source="post: 6252334" data-attributes="member: 6685730"><p>A common thing you'll find in the game: gray areas. This is why Rule Zero is explicitly stated, and players are encouraged to create character concepts for roleplaying, before worrying about rolls. Regarding skills, while I'm tempted to put more emphasis on using a <em>relevant ability</em> instead of assigning them, doing so would make the game even more gray.</p><p></p><p>Larceny: I chose Physical because the skill includes several important physical-related talents: being silent, picking pockets, and sleight-of-hand. It also includes several talents that might be more Mental: hiding, lockpicking, and forgery. The difficulty, of course, is that Physical, Mental, and Metaphysical are all hopelessly intertwined, at least as far as characters are concerned.</p><p></p><p>Profession-artist: does the soul inspire art? Sure. Which would make it an MP skill. But artists also rely on training, observation, and concentration, which point toward the Mental ability. Anyone playing the game would be welcome to mod the skill, to make its relevant ability Metaphysical, which leads us to...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Changing relevant abilities on skills is easy. Expanding the abilities list is more complex. The simplest way to do it would be to introduce one new ability, and create new skills for it, while reassigning others, until each of your four abilities has a fairly even mix. Dividing Physical into Strength and Dexterity is more complex, because you'll slant the entire skills system toward physical applications (having two physical abilities with only one mental and one metaphysical).</p><p></p><p>Note, though, that I've divorced the abilities from the other wings of the game (namely combat and magic). For example, initiative is determined by whatever your best ability is, not Dexterity. There's no damage bonus that is tied only to Strength. You don't get more skills based on your Intelligence. You don't get bonus spells based on your Intelligence, Wisdom, Charisma, Mental, or Metaphysical.</p><p></p><p>However, each ability has its own flavor. Physical is intimately involved in combat, and is the most easily damaged ability. Mental is harder to damage, and can be used (via a skill) to repair Metaphysical, as well as extend spell durations. Metaphysical is the hardest ability to touch, but you'll be damaging it a lot if you cast spells - since MP health is used to power spells.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Good point. Under consideration.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Granted, a dagger can kill just as well as a claymore, but note how damage is defined in the game; damage is more accurately described as a measurement of distance from death, than it is a measure of how many cuts and scrapes a character has. (Another roleplaying opportunity...) By the way, a dagger can benefit from the Backstab perk, while a zweihaender cannot. Additionally, if the scenario is that of a stiletto-related assassination, the GM could declare that death (well, mostly death) is determined by a one-roll contest, instead of extended conflict rules (combat), and apply bonuses based on degrees of success.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Cool spell names are outside the scope of this part of the project. I need a stable, flexible foundation. Great example, though. And thanks for the responses. Let me know if my replies change your perspective at all, and I'll get to your further replies soon!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GMMichael, post: 6252334, member: 6685730"] A common thing you'll find in the game: gray areas. This is why Rule Zero is explicitly stated, and players are encouraged to create character concepts for roleplaying, before worrying about rolls. Regarding skills, while I'm tempted to put more emphasis on using a [I]relevant ability[/I] instead of assigning them, doing so would make the game even more gray. Larceny: I chose Physical because the skill includes several important physical-related talents: being silent, picking pockets, and sleight-of-hand. It also includes several talents that might be more Mental: hiding, lockpicking, and forgery. The difficulty, of course, is that Physical, Mental, and Metaphysical are all hopelessly intertwined, at least as far as characters are concerned. Profession-artist: does the soul inspire art? Sure. Which would make it an MP skill. But artists also rely on training, observation, and concentration, which point toward the Mental ability. Anyone playing the game would be welcome to mod the skill, to make its relevant ability Metaphysical, which leads us to... Changing relevant abilities on skills is easy. Expanding the abilities list is more complex. The simplest way to do it would be to introduce one new ability, and create new skills for it, while reassigning others, until each of your four abilities has a fairly even mix. Dividing Physical into Strength and Dexterity is more complex, because you'll slant the entire skills system toward physical applications (having two physical abilities with only one mental and one metaphysical). Note, though, that I've divorced the abilities from the other wings of the game (namely combat and magic). For example, initiative is determined by whatever your best ability is, not Dexterity. There's no damage bonus that is tied only to Strength. You don't get more skills based on your Intelligence. You don't get bonus spells based on your Intelligence, Wisdom, Charisma, Mental, or Metaphysical. However, each ability has its own flavor. Physical is intimately involved in combat, and is the most easily damaged ability. Mental is harder to damage, and can be used (via a skill) to repair Metaphysical, as well as extend spell durations. Metaphysical is the hardest ability to touch, but you'll be damaging it a lot if you cast spells - since MP health is used to power spells. Good point. Under consideration. Granted, a dagger can kill just as well as a claymore, but note how damage is defined in the game; damage is more accurately described as a measurement of distance from death, than it is a measure of how many cuts and scrapes a character has. (Another roleplaying opportunity...) By the way, a dagger can benefit from the Backstab perk, while a zweihaender cannot. Additionally, if the scenario is that of a stiletto-related assassination, the GM could declare that death (well, mostly death) is determined by a one-roll contest, instead of extended conflict rules (combat), and apply bonuses based on degrees of success. Cool spell names are outside the scope of this part of the project. I need a stable, flexible foundation. Great example, though. And thanks for the responses. Let me know if my replies change your perspective at all, and I'll get to your further replies soon! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Modos RPG Playtest 1: the One True System
Top