Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Mods modding their own threads
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 3396084" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>It looks like three of your users think it is currently a problem. Not hypothetical, not maybe, not potentially, not some day, but currently a problem. I have explained my reluctance to focus on particular already-closed threads: because the very bias a mod should have to defend another mods past decisions will make a discussion of a particular closed thread that already happened useless. No mod is going to publically say another mod was wrong over such a relatively minor issue, and so no discussion would really be furthered by even mentioning it.</p><p></p><p>If we call out a particular closed thread, you and others will defend the mod decision and explain why it was fine and not an issue (for the perfectly reasonable reasons listed above). If we do not call out a particular closed thread, you and others will claim this is all hypothetical because we cannot point to a thread where this is going on. So you have us in a catch-22. Any offer we make or do not make to back up this issue will not help.</p><p></p><p>So we fall back on the only thing we have - telling you this is an issue to us, and unless there is a reason why doing something about it would harm anyone, the fact that it is an issue to us should have some meaning beyond a blanket dismissal as all hypothetical.</p><p></p><p>I understand that you think there is no issue, and I think that is a valid position. But I don't understand why you and a couple of others continue to frame this debate as if nobody thinks it's a problem and it's actually all hypothetical and we shouldn't make a rule about something that nobody thinks is actually going on. That is not the case. Perhaps some users (like myself) are being overly sensitive weenies. But us overly sensitive weenies think this is a real thing actually currently happening, and not some mythical future maybe possibility.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 3396084, member: 2525"] It looks like three of your users think it is currently a problem. Not hypothetical, not maybe, not potentially, not some day, but currently a problem. I have explained my reluctance to focus on particular already-closed threads: because the very bias a mod should have to defend another mods past decisions will make a discussion of a particular closed thread that already happened useless. No mod is going to publically say another mod was wrong over such a relatively minor issue, and so no discussion would really be furthered by even mentioning it. If we call out a particular closed thread, you and others will defend the mod decision and explain why it was fine and not an issue (for the perfectly reasonable reasons listed above). If we do not call out a particular closed thread, you and others will claim this is all hypothetical because we cannot point to a thread where this is going on. So you have us in a catch-22. Any offer we make or do not make to back up this issue will not help. So we fall back on the only thing we have - telling you this is an issue to us, and unless there is a reason why doing something about it would harm anyone, the fact that it is an issue to us should have some meaning beyond a blanket dismissal as all hypothetical. I understand that you think there is no issue, and I think that is a valid position. But I don't understand why you and a couple of others continue to frame this debate as if nobody thinks it's a problem and it's actually all hypothetical and we shouldn't make a rule about something that nobody thinks is actually going on. That is not the case. Perhaps some users (like myself) are being overly sensitive weenies. But us overly sensitive weenies think this is a real thing actually currently happening, and not some mythical future maybe possibility. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Mods modding their own threads
Top