Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Mods modding their own threads
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 3396467" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>So is it your opinion that I have not seen this happen, and I am simply lying in order to create drama? I mean that as an honest question. If you suspect there is no thread where I have seen this happen, then what are you saying when I tell you I have seen it (and the original poster apparently as well)?</p><p></p><p>As for me catching others in a catch-22, hey we are asking for a guideline that apparently causes nobody any harm at all. Untill I see someone actually give a reason why it would harm anyone in the least, I'm not sure how I've caught anyone in anything.</p><p></p><p>As for the thanks mods - I thank the mods often. I think they do a great job in general. I do not think raising this issue of an internal guideline (which doesn't even have to be announced to users - since it really is an internal thing) is some broad brush comdemnation of mods. I've been a mod on several other boards, and I know how hard it is to do and how thankless it can be, and I am fully in support of the mods in general on this board. It's one of the other reasons I don't want to single out any particular mod on this issue. But I think people should feel safe in raising this kind of topic without the fear that others will frame it as an attack on the mods.</p><p></p><p>Heck, the mere fact that you raise the "thanks mods" issue shows the circling the wagon mentallity. Already we are at the point where I suspect if I linked to a thread where a mod threatend to ban someone for smiling wrong, a huge number of people would defend the mod merely out of instinct to defend the mod (and no that has not happened - that one really is a hypothetical). The issue has already risen to the level of being an impossible burden to overcome the presumption that a mod's decision to close a thread is correct.</p><p></p><p>I guess I should bow out of this one (not trying to be dramatic "take my toys and go home" there, though I admit it sounds like that). I really do think there is no possible thread I could present at this point that would result in any reaction other than "you are wrong", because people think I am attacking the mods rather than suggesting a guideline. And if I don't post a link to a thread, people will either continue to imply that the claim we saw it happen is either a lie, or at best an overreaction. This is a no win at this point. </p><p></p><p>Maybe, just by raising the issue, it means it is less likely to happen in the future. I hope so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 3396467, member: 2525"] So is it your opinion that I have not seen this happen, and I am simply lying in order to create drama? I mean that as an honest question. If you suspect there is no thread where I have seen this happen, then what are you saying when I tell you I have seen it (and the original poster apparently as well)? As for me catching others in a catch-22, hey we are asking for a guideline that apparently causes nobody any harm at all. Untill I see someone actually give a reason why it would harm anyone in the least, I'm not sure how I've caught anyone in anything. As for the thanks mods - I thank the mods often. I think they do a great job in general. I do not think raising this issue of an internal guideline (which doesn't even have to be announced to users - since it really is an internal thing) is some broad brush comdemnation of mods. I've been a mod on several other boards, and I know how hard it is to do and how thankless it can be, and I am fully in support of the mods in general on this board. It's one of the other reasons I don't want to single out any particular mod on this issue. But I think people should feel safe in raising this kind of topic without the fear that others will frame it as an attack on the mods. Heck, the mere fact that you raise the "thanks mods" issue shows the circling the wagon mentallity. Already we are at the point where I suspect if I linked to a thread where a mod threatend to ban someone for smiling wrong, a huge number of people would defend the mod merely out of instinct to defend the mod (and no that has not happened - that one really is a hypothetical). The issue has already risen to the level of being an impossible burden to overcome the presumption that a mod's decision to close a thread is correct. I guess I should bow out of this one (not trying to be dramatic "take my toys and go home" there, though I admit it sounds like that). I really do think there is no possible thread I could present at this point that would result in any reaction other than "you are wrong", because people think I am attacking the mods rather than suggesting a guideline. And if I don't post a link to a thread, people will either continue to imply that the claim we saw it happen is either a lie, or at best an overreaction. This is a no win at this point. Maybe, just by raising the issue, it means it is less likely to happen in the future. I hope so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Mods modding their own threads
Top