Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Module Idea-Your opinions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sir Whiskers" data-source="post: 918297" data-attributes="member: 6941"><p>Just so that I understand: You're not allowing the players to create their own characters, you're changing the classes to your own versions, and you're planning this as the first of a series of modules for a campaign. In order:</p><p></p><p>1) I'd be interested in seeing how you work this out. While I wouldn't use this method for every campaign, it might work as a change of pace.</p><p></p><p>2) This won't work for me at all. I might run it as a one-off, but not build a campaign around it. I run 3E characters with my own house rules - even if I like your versions better, I'd have to learn the new classes, then house-rule them, then convince my players to change the classes they run in my campaign, sight unseen. Unless I run only the modules you publish, I'd have to adapt every other 3E/D20 module to your system, which I expect would be much more work than the other way around.</p><p></p><p>3) You intend this to be part of a series of modules to reveal the campaign world to the DM and players over time. Again, this won't work for me. I prefer to run homebrews anyway, but even if I didn't, you're expecting me as the DM to take a lot on faith. If the second or third module doesn't hold my interest, does the campaign end? If I don't like the direction you choose to take the campaign world, what are my options? Since you've already changed the classes, the most likely result I see is running one or at most two of the modules before going back to a more standard campaign. </p><p></p><p>I don't mean to be harsh - I'm intrigued by the character generation idea, and the rest of it might be an excellent one-off adventure, or something I can adapt to a regular campaign. But for the reasons above, I wouldn't be interested in this product as a series or campaign. </p><p></p><p>The more I think about it, this reminds me of the original Dragonlance modules - many people loved them, but I found that they gave me (as a player) too few choices. Things happened in the campaign series, regardless of my character's actions (or inaction). I felt like I was just along for the ride. By creating a setting that "introduces both the he GM and the players to the setting through discovery", I can't help feeling that same lack of control over the campaign, as both GM and player.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sir Whiskers, post: 918297, member: 6941"] Just so that I understand: You're not allowing the players to create their own characters, you're changing the classes to your own versions, and you're planning this as the first of a series of modules for a campaign. In order: 1) I'd be interested in seeing how you work this out. While I wouldn't use this method for every campaign, it might work as a change of pace. 2) This won't work for me at all. I might run it as a one-off, but not build a campaign around it. I run 3E characters with my own house rules - even if I like your versions better, I'd have to learn the new classes, then house-rule them, then convince my players to change the classes they run in my campaign, sight unseen. Unless I run only the modules you publish, I'd have to adapt every other 3E/D20 module to your system, which I expect would be much more work than the other way around. 3) You intend this to be part of a series of modules to reveal the campaign world to the DM and players over time. Again, this won't work for me. I prefer to run homebrews anyway, but even if I didn't, you're expecting me as the DM to take a lot on faith. If the second or third module doesn't hold my interest, does the campaign end? If I don't like the direction you choose to take the campaign world, what are my options? Since you've already changed the classes, the most likely result I see is running one or at most two of the modules before going back to a more standard campaign. I don't mean to be harsh - I'm intrigued by the character generation idea, and the rest of it might be an excellent one-off adventure, or something I can adapt to a regular campaign. But for the reasons above, I wouldn't be interested in this product as a series or campaign. The more I think about it, this reminds me of the original Dragonlance modules - many people loved them, but I found that they gave me (as a player) too few choices. Things happened in the campaign series, regardless of my character's actions (or inaction). I felt like I was just along for the ride. By creating a setting that "introduces both the he GM and the players to the setting through discovery", I can't help feeling that same lack of control over the campaign, as both GM and player. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Module Idea-Your opinions
Top