Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Modules and lack of player engagement...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="overgeeked" data-source="post: 6407349" data-attributes="member: 86653"><p>Due to my D&D group's generally busy adult lives our regular DMs simply don't have the time to create adventures so they typically just run canned modules, series, or adventure paths. This isn't a big deal, we all know what we're in for. But recently the DMs have started complaining a bit about a lack of player engagement in the modules. We play, we sometimes talk in character, we role-play our characters, and all that. After a bit of discussion on the topic the two regular DMs feel that the individual characters are not hooked into the story of the module enough. Whilst that's a fair complaint, it's also something of a given considering we're running through canned adventures with very little if any real changes made. </p><p></p><p>That last bit's the key. I think. The modules are being run straight out of the box and we're generally on rails as there's a section of the adventure the DM has prepped for and that's what we're expected to run through. Not strict or absurd or blatantly obvious rails, rather subtler though nonetheless ever-present.</p><p></p><p>Whilst the one-page backgrounds appendix in Hoard is a step in the right direction, and admittedly some of those hooks are rather neat, I think that approach is kind of backwards. There's really a simple and easy solution staring us in the face, especially with 5th Edition D&D... instead of specifically tailoring a character's background to the module, include open options within the modules for all the backgrounds. Just about every NPC is a hook waiting to happen.</p><p></p><p>Hey, WOTC... how about including at least one paragraph on each of the 13 standard backgrounds with some details about how a that background could plug into that specific adventure. Include a few extra lines with each significant NPC on how a few backgrounds could hook into that character. For example, some NPCs that could have fought with the Soldier (either alongside or against), some NPCs that could have been a target of the Charlatan or Criminal, some NPCs that could have helped or hindered the Urchin, some NPCs that could remember the Entertainer or Guild Craftsman for an excellent or shoddy performance / job. Hell, maybe a random d6 or d8 table with each of the significant NPCs and how two specific backgrounds would hook into that character.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="overgeeked, post: 6407349, member: 86653"] Due to my D&D group's generally busy adult lives our regular DMs simply don't have the time to create adventures so they typically just run canned modules, series, or adventure paths. This isn't a big deal, we all know what we're in for. But recently the DMs have started complaining a bit about a lack of player engagement in the modules. We play, we sometimes talk in character, we role-play our characters, and all that. After a bit of discussion on the topic the two regular DMs feel that the individual characters are not hooked into the story of the module enough. Whilst that's a fair complaint, it's also something of a given considering we're running through canned adventures with very little if any real changes made. That last bit's the key. I think. The modules are being run straight out of the box and we're generally on rails as there's a section of the adventure the DM has prepped for and that's what we're expected to run through. Not strict or absurd or blatantly obvious rails, rather subtler though nonetheless ever-present. Whilst the one-page backgrounds appendix in Hoard is a step in the right direction, and admittedly some of those hooks are rather neat, I think that approach is kind of backwards. There's really a simple and easy solution staring us in the face, especially with 5th Edition D&D... instead of specifically tailoring a character's background to the module, include open options within the modules for all the backgrounds. Just about every NPC is a hook waiting to happen. Hey, WOTC... how about including at least one paragraph on each of the 13 standard backgrounds with some details about how a that background could plug into that specific adventure. Include a few extra lines with each significant NPC on how a few backgrounds could hook into that character. For example, some NPCs that could have fought with the Soldier (either alongside or against), some NPCs that could have been a target of the Charlatan or Criminal, some NPCs that could have helped or hindered the Urchin, some NPCs that could remember the Entertainer or Guild Craftsman for an excellent or shoddy performance / job. Hell, maybe a random d6 or d8 table with each of the significant NPCs and how two specific backgrounds would hook into that character. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Modules and lack of player engagement...
Top