Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 255208" data-attributes="member: 2829">In retrospect, it did indeed appear that way.Not really. It only sounds naive when you snip out the rest of the relevant post, especially when I went to voice my opinion on how it wasn't terribly unbalanced.But there are creatures with far more hit die than that, which is why I said what I did, which is also why my statement wasn't naive, as I had a basis for it.What is naive, however, is when people make an unedjucated balance related judgement about a game device when they don't know how it works or how it relates to other rules.But I can't complain too much, as I've made plenty of those. Anybody that witnessed the thread regarding the cost of magic items for spellcasters that make them should know what I mean by that. Hell, I'll never be able to get rid of that blemish. You can thank Weeble for edjucating me on that issue. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Hey, it's no big deal. I mean, what, the book has been released for 2 days now? Maybe 3? I can't blame you or anything.Also, I apologize for the short post, but I find it terribly irritating when people start ripping apart the epic level rules, claiming that they are unbalanced, sloppy, etc, etc, when they haven't even seen the rules in at least a semi-complete form.I had just come from a thread on the General Discussion board that was basically merely an infantile ELH bashing session. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification