Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mongoose_Matt" data-source="post: 510103" data-attributes="member: 239">A lot of questions!&nbsp; Let's see what I can and cannot answer&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Starwolf:&nbsp; Red Dwarf has already been snatched up and Dr Who rapidly went down hill for me when Berty Bassett made an appearence!Rhombus:&nbsp; It does indeed feature vehicles. . .Baraendur:&nbsp; You missed a few other companies too - Decipher simmediatly springs to mind.&nbsp; But yes, it is a rather high-priced licence. . .Earthshadow:&nbsp; For us, D20 Modern is a very specific application - it can handle certain genres very well, but straight D20 can grant a great deal more freedom if you want to take the rules in certain directions - our new Mech game, for example, could never have been done with D20 Modern, as it needed the full flexibility of D20.&nbsp; The same applies to the game-that-still-cannot-be-mentioned.&nbsp; We always approach a new game with the belief that the rules should bend to fit the genre, _never_ the other way around.&nbsp; As we go into these new games, you are going to see the D20 System do things you never thought possible, so stay tuned!Capellan:&nbsp; We will be taking submissions for Conan, Lone Wolf and the game-that-still-cannot-be-mentioned (really going to have to get an acronym for that - the GTSCBM seems a bit long).&nbsp; If anyone is interested in the former two, give us a shout around the middle of next year when the rules should be in place.&nbsp; For the GTSCBM, I am afraid you'll have to wait until we announce things.It is sci-fi, it is both TV show and film - and if it were original, it probably would not be a licence&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Fourecks:&nbsp; We are well aware of the forthcoming Conan film.&nbsp; At the moment I am trying to stop certain staff members trying to swindle their way on to the set!!!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mongoose_Matt, post: 510103, member: 239"] A lot of questions! Let's see what I can and cannot answer :) Starwolf: Red Dwarf has already been snatched up and Dr Who rapidly went down hill for me when Berty Bassett made an appearence! Rhombus: It does indeed feature vehicles. . . Baraendur: You missed a few other companies too - Decipher simmediatly springs to mind. But yes, it is a rather high-priced licence. . . Earthshadow: For us, D20 Modern is a very specific application - it can handle certain genres very well, but straight D20 can grant a great deal more freedom if you want to take the rules in certain directions - our new Mech game, for example, could never have been done with D20 Modern, as it needed the full flexibility of D20. The same applies to the game-that-still-cannot-be-mentioned. We always approach a new game with the belief that the rules should bend to fit the genre, _never_ the other way around. As we go into these new games, you are going to see the D20 System do things you never thought possible, so stay tuned! Capellan: We will be taking submissions for Conan, Lone Wolf and the game-that-still-cannot-be-mentioned (really going to have to get an acronym for that - the GTSCBM seems a bit long). If anyone is interested in the former two, give us a shout around the middle of next year when the rules should be in place. For the GTSCBM, I am afraid you'll have to wait until we announce things. It is sci-fi, it is both TV show and film - and if it were original, it probably would not be a licence :) Fourecks: We are well aware of the forthcoming Conan film. At the moment I am trying to stop certain staff members trying to swindle their way on to the set!!! [/QUOTE]

Verification