Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="catsclaw227" data-source="post: 3988711" data-attributes="member: 14197">Personally, I disagree.   I think that even though they had a reputation for some editing problems, their supplements were really good.  I know that you didn't say this specifically, but the inference in your statement about them constituting the d20 glut makes it sound like you put them up on par with the companies that flooded the market with BAD d20 supplements. Putting out a lot of d20 supplements doesn't equate putting out bad supplements. If you didn't mean this, then consider this a preemptive apology, but it certainly sounds like you are lumping them in with the FFEs of the d20 movement.EDIT:  As it appears others have as well...  Oh well.  I am of the opinion that their supplements really played well.  I used them and they seemed to add lots of flavor and mechanics.  There wasn't much that played broken, but in all honesty, there were a lot of  companies that, looking back with 20/20 hindsight provided broken mechanics.  My players didn't try to exploit them, so maybe I missed a lot.</blockquote>