Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mongoose's "State of the Mongoose"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dausuul" data-source="post: 5745525" data-attributes="member: 58197"><p>It is indeed, and they've got their work cut out for them. Still, I don't think it's impossible. My observation of the edition wars has been that, as far as the actual game mechanics are concerned:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">4E players don't like 3E/Pathfinder because it does not achieve certain goals (reducing cleric-dependence, balancing the classes, etc.).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">3E/Pathfinder players don't like 4E because of the means the 4E designers chose (healing surges, AEDU universal power structure, etc.) to achieve those goals.</li> </ul><p>That's a simplification on both sides, of course, but I think it gets at the meat of the disagreement.</p><p></p><p>Observe that these are not diametrically opposed positions. 4E players want less cleric-dependence, balanced classes, and so forth. They are not necessarily attached to the specific means used to bring these things about. 3E players don't like healing surges and want distinctive class mechanics, but few object to the idea of less cleric-reliance and better class balance. So in theory, a 5E that chose different means to achieve those goals could be accepted by both sides.</p><p></p><p>(Of course, in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.)</p><p></p><p>There are also more philosophical concerns, having to do with style and emphasis rather than mechanics as such. This is the sort of thing Monte Cook is going on about in the recent Legends and Lore. My sense is that this matters more to the 3E/Pathfinder players and the old-schoolers than it does to 4E players; the typical 4E position has been "It's the mechanics that count." So I expect 5E to be more in the 3E mold, or even AD&D/BECMI, as far as style. Or maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part.</p><p></p><p>Whether all that can overcome the ill-will engendered by the 3E/4E split, and the simple inertia of so many people having jumped ship for Pathfinder, remains to be seen. I dare say the way 5E is rolled out will matter almost as much as the game itself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dausuul, post: 5745525, member: 58197"] It is indeed, and they've got their work cut out for them. Still, I don't think it's impossible. My observation of the edition wars has been that, as far as the actual game mechanics are concerned: [LIST] [*]4E players don't like 3E/Pathfinder because it does not achieve certain goals (reducing cleric-dependence, balancing the classes, etc.). [*]3E/Pathfinder players don't like 4E because of the means the 4E designers chose (healing surges, AEDU universal power structure, etc.) to achieve those goals. [/LIST] That's a simplification on both sides, of course, but I think it gets at the meat of the disagreement. Observe that these are not diametrically opposed positions. 4E players want less cleric-dependence, balanced classes, and so forth. They are not necessarily attached to the specific means used to bring these things about. 3E players don't like healing surges and want distinctive class mechanics, but few object to the idea of less cleric-reliance and better class balance. So in theory, a 5E that chose different means to achieve those goals could be accepted by both sides. (Of course, in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.) There are also more philosophical concerns, having to do with style and emphasis rather than mechanics as such. This is the sort of thing Monte Cook is going on about in the recent Legends and Lore. My sense is that this matters more to the 3E/Pathfinder players and the old-schoolers than it does to 4E players; the typical 4E position has been "It's the mechanics that count." So I expect 5E to be more in the 3E mold, or even AD&D/BECMI, as far as style. Or maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part. Whether all that can overcome the ill-will engendered by the 3E/4E split, and the simple inertia of so many people having jumped ship for Pathfinder, remains to be seen. I dare say the way 5E is rolled out will matter almost as much as the game itself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mongoose's "State of the Mongoose"
Top