Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Monk 3.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Technik4" data-source="post: 3429389" data-attributes="member: 7211"><p>Fair enough, if we are talking strictly damage output I agree with you. Again, with Dodge and a higher Dex you effectively have +2 AC to compensate (and since you have a low probability of hitting, I suggest Fighting Defensively for an additional +3 AC). The difference in philosophy is I think a high-AC monk can meaningfully contribute to combat, despite having poor damage output whereas you do not.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The con can be switched, but again the +2 AC (and mobility isn't entirely usurped by tumbling is it? After all, you can still roll very low on a tumble).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally I would agree with him for your build the Weapon Focus would probably be more pertinent.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is not significant if there is a fighter in the party. Assume 16 Str, +1 Weapon, Weapon Focus, and Weapon Spec - thats a +9 to hit with a +6 damage modifier (more if the weapon is 2-h). Not only will he hit more often, but he will do more damage. The significance of the monk's contribution is what is small - his roll is more of a harrier and less of a damage-dealer, in my experience (and if not a fighter, then a barbarian). Compared to a 4th level rogue with +2d6 sneak attack, 18 dex (halfling or elf) the numbers again come up in their favor (Since they only get sneak attack when they flank or get initiative).</p><p></p><p>The point is that a monk cannot supplant a fighter (or barbarian) in combat nor can he replace the rogue out of combat. So I tend to make dex-based monks (though I have played a Str-based half-orc monk before, as well as a wisdom based human monk and a nezumi Rog1/MnkX) to synergize with the rogue and tend to accept the low damage (though at higher levels you get niftier dice to roll). Put bluntly: I don't think the bonus damage from strength is significant enough to play strength-based monks (unless you have a number of high stats).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A character with an Intelligence of 12 gets roleplayed differently than one with 8 in games I have played in. Untrained Knowledge (Local) checks, Intelligence checks, and other things take this into account even if the rules don't explicitly. I'll admit there isn't much difference between a Charisma of 8 and 6, but I did say 'mental' abilities.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not at all. But I would say: "If you want to play a half-orc, I hope you have high stats to play with!" <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Technik4, post: 3429389, member: 7211"] Fair enough, if we are talking strictly damage output I agree with you. Again, with Dodge and a higher Dex you effectively have +2 AC to compensate (and since you have a low probability of hitting, I suggest Fighting Defensively for an additional +3 AC). The difference in philosophy is I think a high-AC monk can meaningfully contribute to combat, despite having poor damage output whereas you do not. The con can be switched, but again the +2 AC (and mobility isn't entirely usurped by tumbling is it? After all, you can still roll very low on a tumble). Personally I would agree with him for your build the Weapon Focus would probably be more pertinent. It is not significant if there is a fighter in the party. Assume 16 Str, +1 Weapon, Weapon Focus, and Weapon Spec - thats a +9 to hit with a +6 damage modifier (more if the weapon is 2-h). Not only will he hit more often, but he will do more damage. The significance of the monk's contribution is what is small - his roll is more of a harrier and less of a damage-dealer, in my experience (and if not a fighter, then a barbarian). Compared to a 4th level rogue with +2d6 sneak attack, 18 dex (halfling or elf) the numbers again come up in their favor (Since they only get sneak attack when they flank or get initiative). The point is that a monk cannot supplant a fighter (or barbarian) in combat nor can he replace the rogue out of combat. So I tend to make dex-based monks (though I have played a Str-based half-orc monk before, as well as a wisdom based human monk and a nezumi Rog1/MnkX) to synergize with the rogue and tend to accept the low damage (though at higher levels you get niftier dice to roll). Put bluntly: I don't think the bonus damage from strength is significant enough to play strength-based monks (unless you have a number of high stats). A character with an Intelligence of 12 gets roleplayed differently than one with 8 in games I have played in. Untrained Knowledge (Local) checks, Intelligence checks, and other things take this into account even if the rules don't explicitly. I'll admit there isn't much difference between a Charisma of 8 and 6, but I did say 'mental' abilities. Not at all. But I would say: "If you want to play a half-orc, I hope you have high stats to play with!" :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Monk 3.5
Top