Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Herzog" data-source="post: 4517841" data-attributes="member: 25696">The reasoning is actually kind of silly.He saw the Feat that lets you add your monk level to your rogue level for the purpose of gaining unarmed damage.This made him want to get a lvl of monk. When the DM, and actually most of the other players, said he couldn't because his aligment didn't match, he argued, but in the end (I think) he agreed.However, for some obscure reason (even if the feat option would no longer be valid) he still wants unarmed damage increase. As I understand it, he would like to be able to do (lethal) sneak attack damage with his bare hands.The Bo9S option seems a good bet, although we currently don't allow the book (mainly because we are hesitant about introducing stances and maneuvers, so maybe the feat will be accepted).I think the Improved Natural Attack will be frowned upon, but I'll suggest the option.The Dragon Compendium (or, to be more precise, anything from Dragon Magazine) is not really part of the 'normal' ruleset, and will therefore not be allowed, unless I can make a REALLY good argument to include it. But thanks for pointing it out!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Herzog, post: 4517841, member: 25696"] The reasoning is actually kind of silly. He saw the Feat that lets you add your monk level to your rogue level for the purpose of gaining unarmed damage. This made him want to get a lvl of monk. When the DM, and actually most of the other players, said he couldn't because his aligment didn't match, he argued, but in the end (I think) he agreed. However, for some obscure reason (even if the feat option would no longer be valid) he still wants unarmed damage increase. As I understand it, he would like to be able to do (lethal) sneak attack damage with his bare hands. The Bo9S option seems a good bet, although we currently don't allow the book (mainly because we are hesitant about introducing stances and maneuvers, so maybe the feat will be accepted). I think the Improved Natural Attack will be frowned upon, but I'll suggest the option. The Dragon Compendium (or, to be more precise, anything from Dragon Magazine) is not really part of the 'normal' ruleset, and will therefore not be allowed, unless I can make a REALLY good argument to include it. But thanks for pointing it out! [/QUOTE]

Verification