Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Camarath" data-source="post: 1299170" data-attributes="member: 11987">Which made it pointless since it was no different than a Large version of a Bastard Sword. I believe it to be an unfortunate juxtaposition of two weapon ideas. One of those ideas was a Large version of a Bastard Sword (which I believe was pointless in 3e since one could just use a Large version of a Bastard Sword) and the other was a bigger sword for use by medium characters. Only the bigger sword idea for the Fullblade needs to be updated to 3.5 (or IMO presented in 3e) since the rules already proved for Large Bastard Swords.Thus I suggest allowing the Fullblade as a 2d8 Medium Exotic Two-Handed weapon since follows the normal pattern for what constitutes an Exotic weapon and results in a useful weapon. Other wise there is no point to the weapon in 3.5.If one wanted to preserve the Fullblade/Bastard Swords juxtaposition in 3.5 I think my suggestion earlier might be useful.</blockquote>