Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Destil" data-source="post: 400730" data-attributes="member: 1980">Monk = Slam.My own take: any creature with a natural 'slam' attack would get the benifits to all slam attacks. Normaly natural weapons don't get iteritive attacks, with slams being the exception (it's a unnatural, natraul weapon, I guess). Since the monk basicly uses slams (compair the MM slam description to the PH monk attack description) he'd get the bonus. As far as flurry of blows, I'd simply rule that any creature who uses slams has their entire body enhanced when magic fang is cast to enhance their slams. Thus you get the benifit on the extra attack. As far as the FR NPC... well, really in my opinion most suplements have much looser rules than the three core books, so I'd quietly disreguard it. It strikes me as far to weird that when the monk is supposted to be alternating various kicks, elbows, knees, headbuts, and the like, even without flurry of blows, that magic fang could do any less than affect his entire body and work at all.Also makes MF it a great deal for druids in Elemental Form, and vampires. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>