Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Caliban" data-source="post: 2062850" data-attributes="member: 284">Sorry, but I, and others, disagree. Stating it over and over again doesn't make it true KD.&nbsp;&nbsp;Well, one possibility is the +1 AC bonus indicated for a 5th level monk on Table 3-10 of the PHB, under the column labeled &quot;AC Bonus&quot;. I think the belt is referring to that AC bonus (and that is another reason why I think they are supposed to be two different AC bonus abilities). &nbsp;You think it is referring to the more general AC bonus. You may very well be right, but I'm going to stick with my ruling until I see something official one way or the other. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;I have made the case. You just choose not to accept that point of view. And I don't think you are being unreasonable in the respect.&nbsp;&nbsp; I just think you are being unreasonably strident when stating your case.&nbsp; You are the one who seems to have a problem when people disagree with you.&nbsp; (And lest you think I'm being a hyprocrite, I have had similar problems dealing with disagreements. I'm trying to do better on that score.)&nbsp;I don't expect to convince you KD. I'm only responding because you keep singling me out. &nbsp;But you can't bully me into agreeing with you, no matter how hard you try. I understand your point of view, and I agree that it is a valid way of reading the rules, I just don't agree with it in this case. Why don't we just agree to disagree and leave it at that?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Caliban, post: 2062850, member: 284"] Sorry, but I, and others, disagree. Stating it over and over again doesn't make it true KD. Well, one possibility is the +1 AC bonus indicated for a 5th level monk on Table 3-10 of the PHB, under the column labeled "AC Bonus". I think the belt is referring to that AC bonus (and that is another reason why I think they are supposed to be two different AC bonus abilities). You think it is referring to the more general AC bonus. You may very well be right, but I'm going to stick with my ruling until I see something official one way or the other. I have made the case. You just choose not to accept that point of view. And I don't think you are being unreasonable in the respect. I just think you are being unreasonably strident when stating your case. You are the one who seems to have a problem when people disagree with you. (And lest you think I'm being a hyprocrite, I have had similar problems dealing with disagreements. I'm trying to do better on that score.) I don't expect to convince you KD. I'm only responding because you keep singling me out. But you can't bully me into agreeing with you, no matter how hard you try. I understand your point of view, and I agree that it is a valid way of reading the rules, I just don't agree with it in this case. Why don't we just agree to disagree and leave it at that? [/QUOTE]

Verification