Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BAW" data-source="post: 2066790" data-attributes="member: 17773">Hmmmm.....Seems to be a bit of disagreement over this question, and I thought everything had been wrapped up after 3 posts  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek!    :o"  data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" /> Oh well, I don't know why but the image of a druid in hide armour always bothered me a little. Flavour-wise, while the item is called a Monk's belt, it seems to suit my image of a druid; a rough cloak and a belt-no obvious massive armour for protection. Not like the dragon full-plate wearing ones you get wandering around trying to survive.As for a comparison with a druid. I think things will turn out similar to the cleric-very stat dependent and not quite as good. The difference will be when wild-shape becomes involved where the extra AC (provided it doesn't stack with the wild-shape property) might actually make combat in animal form a possibility, though it is up to your GM as to which slots you can keep-so a pretty wide variation there.I'll be back and post a comparison for a high level druid optimized for AC in animal form. Might take a little time though</blockquote>