Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monks Suck
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Asisreo" data-source="post: 8051643" data-attributes="member: 7019027"><p>There's nowhere left for the discussion to go. We've distilled the game down to DPR, AC, and save chances when there's more to combat than those three. </p><p></p><p>I can argue whether or not it's fair for a TWF rogue to have sneak attack or not. We can all agree if they don't, there damage goes out the window. I could argue whether or not it's fair to assume a fighter at any level will have more protective armor than the ones they start with. We can agree if they don't, tanking goes out the window. I can argue most wizards never take a control spell that parallels stunning strike. We can agree if they don't, a monk in a party is much more unique. </p><p></p><p>And I can make these claims uncontested just as anyone can make uncontested claims about how sneak attacks are guaranteed every turn or that all mundane equipment will be available and affordable by level 2. </p><p></p><p>Whichever sounds reasonable or gets the most agreements doesn't matter since you can't quantify an appropriate estimation based on the most likely maximum of 10 responders to this 45 page deep discussion. The sample size is too small and their testimony may differ from their actual play. </p><p></p><p>Honestly, I can play this way: </p><p></p><p>Let's assume the amount of opportunities to attack that a fighter gets every turn equates to 60% of all their enemies and a fighter's DPR is 45. Now, let's assume the monk's extra movement speed grants them 95% opportunities to make their attack every turn. A monk's DPR is 40. The fighter only has an effective DPR of 27 while the monk has an effective DPR of 38. </p><p></p><p>It's nonsense based on assumptions that you require the audience to have in order for your predictions to work. Even if you consider yourself being generous, the actual number is no more than the assumption it's based on. </p><p></p><p>You can start the discussion with: "let's assume the fighter will have GWM and they do this damage..."</p><p></p><p>I can say "No. I don't think an average fighter will pick up the GWM feat."</p><p></p><p>You could respond with: "Look how often it comes up in these forums! Everyone I know who plays fighter takes it!"</p><p></p><p>And I'd say "So? That doesn't mean the average fighter takes GWM, even when the feat's available." </p><p></p><p>It's the same energy as "The earth is flat! Let's assume the earth is flat, that would explain this! Look around, these are flat plains, not a round curve!"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Asisreo, post: 8051643, member: 7019027"] There's nowhere left for the discussion to go. We've distilled the game down to DPR, AC, and save chances when there's more to combat than those three. I can argue whether or not it's fair for a TWF rogue to have sneak attack or not. We can all agree if they don't, there damage goes out the window. I could argue whether or not it's fair to assume a fighter at any level will have more protective armor than the ones they start with. We can agree if they don't, tanking goes out the window. I can argue most wizards never take a control spell that parallels stunning strike. We can agree if they don't, a monk in a party is much more unique. And I can make these claims uncontested just as anyone can make uncontested claims about how sneak attacks are guaranteed every turn or that all mundane equipment will be available and affordable by level 2. Whichever sounds reasonable or gets the most agreements doesn't matter since you can't quantify an appropriate estimation based on the most likely maximum of 10 responders to this 45 page deep discussion. The sample size is too small and their testimony may differ from their actual play. Honestly, I can play this way: Let's assume the amount of opportunities to attack that a fighter gets every turn equates to 60% of all their enemies and a fighter's DPR is 45. Now, let's assume the monk's extra movement speed grants them 95% opportunities to make their attack every turn. A monk's DPR is 40. The fighter only has an effective DPR of 27 while the monk has an effective DPR of 38. It's nonsense based on assumptions that you require the audience to have in order for your predictions to work. Even if you consider yourself being generous, the actual number is no more than the assumption it's based on. You can start the discussion with: "let's assume the fighter will have GWM and they do this damage..." I can say "No. I don't think an average fighter will pick up the GWM feat." You could respond with: "Look how often it comes up in these forums! Everyone I know who plays fighter takes it!" And I'd say "So? That doesn't mean the average fighter takes GWM, even when the feat's available." It's the same energy as "The earth is flat! Let's assume the earth is flat, that would explain this! Look around, these are flat plains, not a round curve!" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monks Suck
Top