Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monks & the Improved Natural Attack Feat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deset Gled" data-source="post: 4019056" data-attributes="member: 7808"><p>Obviously, some people (myself included) disagree that a prerequisite should be treated the same as the effect it is a requirement for. However, your Magic Fang example does not help prove your point here for two reasons. First, monk strikes are explicitly treated as natural attacks for "spells and effects", so this would fall under the category of spells, not effects, and wouldn't be an issue. Second, note that the target of Magic Fang is one "living creature touched" not a natural weapon; a monk is a living creature, and thus fulfills the prerequisite of the spell.</p><p></p><p>I could have sworn there was a Sage article that specifically addressed the issue of whether a prerequisite counts as an effect, but I haven't been able to find it now. IIRC, it gave an example that changed my mind for awhile, but then someone else found text that contradicted it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The PHB2 has been brought up many times in other threads, but was always thrown out as being a meaningless point because it gave INA to a monk at first level; knowing that the authors forgot about one prerequisite makes it pretty easy to assume they forgot the second. </p><p></p><p>The PHB2 errata, however, is a new point that I haven't thought about before. It is very significant to me, as it is the first errata document that we have addressing the issue (in a very roundabout way). It's a pretty odd case, and I'm not 100% sure how it meshes with the Primary Source rule. It's obviously official errata, giving it power over <em>a</em> primary source, but it's not addressing <em>the </em> primary source in question. I'll have to mull this over for a bit and get back to you with an opinion.</p><p></p><p>For reference, the PHB2 errata says: </p><p></p><p>Page 212 –Monk Destroyer Build Table</p><p>[Substitution]</p><p>Improved Natural Attack cannot be attained until 6th level for a monk. An alternative is to take Power Attack at 1st level, Improved Bull Rush at 3rd level in place of Power Attack, and Improved Natural Attack in place of Improved Bull Rush.</p><p></p><p>You're quite welcome. I'm glad it was helpful.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deset Gled, post: 4019056, member: 7808"] Obviously, some people (myself included) disagree that a prerequisite should be treated the same as the effect it is a requirement for. However, your Magic Fang example does not help prove your point here for two reasons. First, monk strikes are explicitly treated as natural attacks for "spells and effects", so this would fall under the category of spells, not effects, and wouldn't be an issue. Second, note that the target of Magic Fang is one "living creature touched" not a natural weapon; a monk is a living creature, and thus fulfills the prerequisite of the spell. I could have sworn there was a Sage article that specifically addressed the issue of whether a prerequisite counts as an effect, but I haven't been able to find it now. IIRC, it gave an example that changed my mind for awhile, but then someone else found text that contradicted it. The PHB2 has been brought up many times in other threads, but was always thrown out as being a meaningless point because it gave INA to a monk at first level; knowing that the authors forgot about one prerequisite makes it pretty easy to assume they forgot the second. The PHB2 errata, however, is a new point that I haven't thought about before. It is very significant to me, as it is the first errata document that we have addressing the issue (in a very roundabout way). It's a pretty odd case, and I'm not 100% sure how it meshes with the Primary Source rule. It's obviously official errata, giving it power over [I]a[/I] primary source, but it's not addressing [I]the [/I] primary source in question. I'll have to mull this over for a bit and get back to you with an opinion. For reference, the PHB2 errata says: Page 212 –Monk Destroyer Build Table [Substitution] Improved Natural Attack cannot be attained until 6th level for a monk. An alternative is to take Power Attack at 1st level, Improved Bull Rush at 3rd level in place of Power Attack, and Improved Natural Attack in place of Improved Bull Rush. You're quite welcome. I'm glad it was helpful. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monks & the Improved Natural Attack Feat
Top