Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Corwin" data-source="post: 63422" data-attributes="member: 1560">Comparing our posts are we? OK. You begin by dismissing my points and instructing me to try reading ther PHB. You "explain" to all of us that there is no bedate because the Sage has ruled and so we are all wrong. You then run out of anything constructive and start taking things out of context in order to sling insults*. Just as a comparison, please show me a single post here on this thread, form me, that has nothing relative to add or comment on. You know, like the worthless slam posts you have tossed in. Just one (other than this one of course), all I ask. If you are going to exchange banter with me, at least have something to add to the discussion. That was all I asked. You failed to do that. That was the reason for my comment.*such as the Icebear Incident: wherein I comment specifically on his post about listing the individuals with which he abides by their decisions. You then went off on tangent after tangent.It was never your "viewpoint". It was more like your distribution of your enlightenment. You got on here and informed all of us how it was. If we didn't like it, we must relegate our opinion to "house rule". After all, there is nothing to debate, you are correct and we are all guessing.BTW, your attempts to downplay your opinion of yourself as guru is lost on me. You have long considered yourself "in th know". Perhaps I should jump in the Wayback Machine (tm) and look into some of the older threads from the old board. Maybe I'm mistaken, but didn't you have a Q&A column on a D&D web'zine for awhile?Artoomis' list? Am I waiting to make my decision now? Is that how you have twisted things in your head? Odd. I specifically said that I had made my decision already actually. I told him I wouldn't mind seeing his list. I was curious what he had on it. Should I go back and pull quotes? Or can you hit the back button?Actually, I readily classify Artoomis as a rules guru as well. Anyone who knows the rules extremely qualifies for that title. Heck, even I am one I guess. I am very well versed in the rules. Are you maybe under the impression that there is only supposed to be one? Maybe there should only be you and no one else? Interesting...I will definitely stop responding now (at least to you) as it seems you have become enraged. If that silly little comment wasn't clearly supposed to be taken lightly, I don't know what to tell you. I (like Artoomis) made it clear this was all in fun. I apologize and will refrain from snipping at you in the future since it seems you are sensitive to that sort of thing. Indeed.</blockquote>

Verification