Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Monster books: No love?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgbrowning" data-source="post: 1670305" data-attributes="member: 5724"><p>Heya Mike, might as well take your excellent post and turn it into a shameless plug for our upcoming Monster Geographica books. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> The monster number is important to me as well, I know I've deliberately not bought a monster book because there were too few monsters for me. [plug]That's why Monster Geographica books contain 200 monsters![/plug]</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is something else I've noticed. Personally, I think that a lot of this has to do with the formation that monsters books use: Alphabeticaly listing each monster by name. This format's great when you're already familiar with every monster and it's relative power, but when faced with a new book of unfamiliar monsters, what GMs really need is a CR arrangement. That way they can go right to that group of monsters they can use to challange their party without having to constantly flip around in the book's pages. And then, remembering "What was that new cool monster's name?" is less of an issue because it's easier to remember that it partially cool because it was of an appropriate challange for your group. That's why the Monster Geographica monsters are arranged by ascending Challange Rating rather than Alpha-name. Even the monsters by type (ala Fey or Abberation) is listed according to CR rather than alphabetically. But an alpha Table of Contents allows for name searches, of course.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hopefully we'll challange the assumption that monster books have to follow WotC's lead in design. Monster Geographica books are compilations of 200 OGC monsters (around 50% updates from 3.0 to 3.5) from 20 or so sources. They're focused on a particular environment (the first one is Underground), pocket-sized, contain no art, are arranged by CR not name, and sell for only $20. All of this is most-definitely <strong>not</strong> WotC SOP. Hopefully, this means they'll sell great rather than bomb... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> *cross fingers*</p><p></p><p>joe b.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgbrowning, post: 1670305, member: 5724"] Heya Mike, might as well take your excellent post and turn it into a shameless plug for our upcoming Monster Geographica books. :) The monster number is important to me as well, I know I've deliberately not bought a monster book because there were too few monsters for me. [plug]That's why Monster Geographica books contain 200 monsters![/plug] This is something else I've noticed. Personally, I think that a lot of this has to do with the formation that monsters books use: Alphabeticaly listing each monster by name. This format's great when you're already familiar with every monster and it's relative power, but when faced with a new book of unfamiliar monsters, what GMs really need is a CR arrangement. That way they can go right to that group of monsters they can use to challange their party without having to constantly flip around in the book's pages. And then, remembering "What was that new cool monster's name?" is less of an issue because it's easier to remember that it partially cool because it was of an appropriate challange for your group. That's why the Monster Geographica monsters are arranged by ascending Challange Rating rather than Alpha-name. Even the monsters by type (ala Fey or Abberation) is listed according to CR rather than alphabetically. But an alpha Table of Contents allows for name searches, of course. Hopefully we'll challange the assumption that monster books have to follow WotC's lead in design. Monster Geographica books are compilations of 200 OGC monsters (around 50% updates from 3.0 to 3.5) from 20 or so sources. They're focused on a particular environment (the first one is Underground), pocket-sized, contain no art, are arranged by CR not name, and sell for only $20. All of this is most-definitely [b]not[/b] WotC SOP. Hopefully, this means they'll sell great rather than bomb... :) *cross fingers* joe b. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Monster books: No love?
Top