Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monster infomation in combat - free action ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pming" data-source="post: 6854987" data-attributes="member: 45197"><p>Hiya!</p><p></p><p>I pretty much run how [MENTION=9501]Prism[/MENTION] runs it... via <em>player</em> questions/experience and his characters background. If the player can give me a good reason why his Dwarven Champion would have any idea what-so-ever about the sensory capabilities of a Willo-the-Whisp, then I'll allow an INT roll. Otherwise I typically reply with something that any commoner who is "interested in monsters and such" might have come across in books, stories, etc.</p><p></p><p>Often I always describe the monster unless it's one that everyone at the table would know...and sometimes this works against them. :evilgrin: So I will say <em>"You see a hulking creature emerge from the shadows. It's a full two heads taller than a man, has skin the colour of rotting flesh, and dark, black eyes. It's gangly arms end in elongated fingers tipped with claws as dark as night. It's long, snout-like maw is dripping with blood from it's last meal, of which you see on the ground behind it...a poor, unfortunate orc"</em>. It's up to the players to decide if this is a Troll or not. They can just make the assumption, or they can ask for a confirmation roll, so to speak. I'll ask them for their INT adjustment and make the roll for them. Then I describe their resluts "From the looks of it, it fits the description of a troll, other than you've never heard of them being this pasty-green colour...although albino trolls are fairly frequent, this one does have a distinctly green tinge to it" (if he failed by a few points)...or "Yup, sure looks like it. Everything fits what you know of trolls" (if he failed by a lot) ...or "Yes, but it's far worse. You've heard of these...and you're pretty sure it's an undead troll...a horrid mix between a Ghoul and a Troll...this is a <em>Thoul</em>!" (if he succeeded).</p><p></p><p>I would <em>NEVER</em> let players roll themselves and see their results. Their characters would have no idea at all if they have correctly guessed, remembered, or even heard about something about a creature. If the player sees the results, and sees his 24 total...and I say "Yup, sure looks like a troll...and undead one...a <em>thoul</em>!" the player KNOWS he is correct...as opposed to, well, not.</p><p></p><p>Then again, I pretty much make all "knowledge" and "uncertain outcome" rolls on behalf of a player then hand out info as appropriate. Like with stealth checks, picking locks, looking for traps, reading languages, etc. Anything where success/failure isn't obvious or binary (e.g., making a to hit roll, save, climbing a wall, etc.). I mean, if everyone searches a room, and nobody rolls higher than a 6, you can bet coppers to platinum that the players will say "We search again" and find some way to justify that search. Luckily for me though, my players just let the dice fall where they may and rarely try and pull those kind of shenanigans. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>^_^</p><p></p><p>Paul L. Ming</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pming, post: 6854987, member: 45197"] Hiya! I pretty much run how [MENTION=9501]Prism[/MENTION] runs it... via [I]player[/I] questions/experience and his characters background. If the player can give me a good reason why his Dwarven Champion would have any idea what-so-ever about the sensory capabilities of a Willo-the-Whisp, then I'll allow an INT roll. Otherwise I typically reply with something that any commoner who is "interested in monsters and such" might have come across in books, stories, etc. Often I always describe the monster unless it's one that everyone at the table would know...and sometimes this works against them. :evilgrin: So I will say [I]"You see a hulking creature emerge from the shadows. It's a full two heads taller than a man, has skin the colour of rotting flesh, and dark, black eyes. It's gangly arms end in elongated fingers tipped with claws as dark as night. It's long, snout-like maw is dripping with blood from it's last meal, of which you see on the ground behind it...a poor, unfortunate orc"[/I]. It's up to the players to decide if this is a Troll or not. They can just make the assumption, or they can ask for a confirmation roll, so to speak. I'll ask them for their INT adjustment and make the roll for them. Then I describe their resluts "From the looks of it, it fits the description of a troll, other than you've never heard of them being this pasty-green colour...although albino trolls are fairly frequent, this one does have a distinctly green tinge to it" (if he failed by a few points)...or "Yup, sure looks like it. Everything fits what you know of trolls" (if he failed by a lot) ...or "Yes, but it's far worse. You've heard of these...and you're pretty sure it's an undead troll...a horrid mix between a Ghoul and a Troll...this is a [I]Thoul[/I]!" (if he succeeded). I would [I]NEVER[/I] let players roll themselves and see their results. Their characters would have no idea at all if they have correctly guessed, remembered, or even heard about something about a creature. If the player sees the results, and sees his 24 total...and I say "Yup, sure looks like a troll...and undead one...a [I]thoul[/I]!" the player KNOWS he is correct...as opposed to, well, not. Then again, I pretty much make all "knowledge" and "uncertain outcome" rolls on behalf of a player then hand out info as appropriate. Like with stealth checks, picking locks, looking for traps, reading languages, etc. Anything where success/failure isn't obvious or binary (e.g., making a to hit roll, save, climbing a wall, etc.). I mean, if everyone searches a room, and nobody rolls higher than a 6, you can bet coppers to platinum that the players will say "We search again" and find some way to justify that search. Luckily for me though, my players just let the dice fall where they may and rarely try and pull those kind of shenanigans. :) ^_^ Paul L. Ming [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monster infomation in combat - free action ?
Top