Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Monster Initiative
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mattcolville" data-source="post: 5360198" data-attributes="member: 1300"><p>This is how we played from about 1986 until around 1996. And while I'm not *certain* I think it fostered teamwork. Since the players all acted at the same time, they tended to organize their actions.</p><p></p><p>But that took longer. Because they sat around for sometimes half an hour talking about what the best thing to do was.</p><p></p><p>But it was more fun, I think. Since the players felt like they were working together. </p><p></p><p>Nowadays it feels like being on offense in baseball. When it's your turn, it's your job to basically hit the ball as far as you can, with some rare tactical exceptions. There's no sense of strategy. </p><p></p><p>Whereas it used to feel more like being on defense--or really either side--in Football. We think the enemy is going to do this, here's what we're going to do to stop them. </p><p></p><p>One problem I had playing a Warlord was that it only worked as advertised if the players were willing to sacrifice maximizing their short-term solo effectiveness, in order to maximize the group's long-term effectiveness.</p><p></p><p>In other words; we'd be fighting a lot of Undead of different roles. One of whom was a Leader. The Leader was buffing all his mans, keeping everyone alive. Or rather, "alive."</p><p></p><p>I said "We need to stop that dude, otherwise this battle will take forever and we'll blow all our resources." I lay down all my cool enemy debuffs and PC buffs, but on each player's turn, he'd almost always just focus on the bad guy in front of him. Even though the bad guy in front of him was almost unkillable because of the Leader.</p><p></p><p>"I can't attack the leader," they'd say "because then I'll take an attack of op from this dude."</p><p></p><p>Well, yes. Yes you will. That's the sacrifice, that's the price we pay in order for the group to achieve together what it couldn't do when each man acts alone.</p><p></p><p>Otherwise, if each player on his turn looks at the guy in front of him and makes his decision based on how to maximize damage to that bad guy, there's no need for or benefit from a PC Leader. Other than healing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mattcolville, post: 5360198, member: 1300"] This is how we played from about 1986 until around 1996. And while I'm not *certain* I think it fostered teamwork. Since the players all acted at the same time, they tended to organize their actions. But that took longer. Because they sat around for sometimes half an hour talking about what the best thing to do was. But it was more fun, I think. Since the players felt like they were working together. Nowadays it feels like being on offense in baseball. When it's your turn, it's your job to basically hit the ball as far as you can, with some rare tactical exceptions. There's no sense of strategy. Whereas it used to feel more like being on defense--or really either side--in Football. We think the enemy is going to do this, here's what we're going to do to stop them. One problem I had playing a Warlord was that it only worked as advertised if the players were willing to sacrifice maximizing their short-term solo effectiveness, in order to maximize the group's long-term effectiveness. In other words; we'd be fighting a lot of Undead of different roles. One of whom was a Leader. The Leader was buffing all his mans, keeping everyone alive. Or rather, "alive." I said "We need to stop that dude, otherwise this battle will take forever and we'll blow all our resources." I lay down all my cool enemy debuffs and PC buffs, but on each player's turn, he'd almost always just focus on the bad guy in front of him. Even though the bad guy in front of him was almost unkillable because of the Leader. "I can't attack the leader," they'd say "because then I'll take an attack of op from this dude." Well, yes. Yes you will. That's the sacrifice, that's the price we pay in order for the group to achieve together what it couldn't do when each man acts alone. Otherwise, if each player on his turn looks at the guy in front of him and makes his decision based on how to maximize damage to that bad guy, there's no need for or benefit from a PC Leader. Other than healing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Monster Initiative
Top