Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monster Manual 2025: Is Multiattack order prescriptive now?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Keith Ammann" data-source="post: 9606008" data-attributes="member: 6804515"><p>In 5E14, it was established that monsters could use the attacks in their Multiattack in any order. I'm starting to wonder whether that policy has changed in 5E24.</p><p></p><p>In the carrion crawler stat block, Multiattack is defined thus: "The carrion crawler uses Paralyzing Tentacles and makes one Bite attack." That's not in alphabetical order, nor is it in attack/ability order, as these things traditionally have been. Compare the behir: "The behir makes one Bite attack and uses Constrict." These <em>are</em> in alphabetical order—<em>and</em> in attack/ability order. The reversal of those on the carrion crawler suggests that the order is intentional.</p><p></p><p>If true, <strong>this is a very big deal.</strong> The optimal sequence for the behir, for instance, is to use Constrict before Bite. If the Multiattack order is prescriptive, then it's locked into a particular attack pattern that's suboptimal. The same goes for the displacer beast, whose Multiattack action consists of "one Rend attack and one Tentacle attack"—the traditional stat block order, optimal if the displacer beast is already adjacent to its target but not if it's approaching and wants to make a Tentacle attack while it's still 10 feet away, before moving into the target's reach.</p><p></p><p>If the order of actions in a Multiattack is no longer up to DM discretion, as it was in 5E14, that's the sort of thing that needs to be stated explicitly. I can't find anything that says whether it is or it isn't.</p><p></p><p>(I'm looking for actual answers here, not edgy opinions. Thanks in advance.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Keith Ammann, post: 9606008, member: 6804515"] In 5E14, it was established that monsters could use the attacks in their Multiattack in any order. I'm starting to wonder whether that policy has changed in 5E24. In the carrion crawler stat block, Multiattack is defined thus: "The carrion crawler uses Paralyzing Tentacles and makes one Bite attack." That's not in alphabetical order, nor is it in attack/ability order, as these things traditionally have been. Compare the behir: "The behir makes one Bite attack and uses Constrict." These [I]are[/I] in alphabetical order—[I]and[/I] in attack/ability order. The reversal of those on the carrion crawler suggests that the order is intentional. If true, [B]this is a very big deal.[/B] The optimal sequence for the behir, for instance, is to use Constrict before Bite. If the Multiattack order is prescriptive, then it's locked into a particular attack pattern that's suboptimal. The same goes for the displacer beast, whose Multiattack action consists of "one Rend attack and one Tentacle attack"—the traditional stat block order, optimal if the displacer beast is already adjacent to its target but not if it's approaching and wants to make a Tentacle attack while it's still 10 feet away, before moving into the target's reach. If the order of actions in a Multiattack is no longer up to DM discretion, as it was in 5E14, that's the sort of thing that needs to be stated explicitly. I can't find anything that says whether it is or it isn't. (I'm looking for actual answers here, not edgy opinions. Thanks in advance.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monster Manual 2025: Is Multiattack order prescriptive now?
Top