Monster Manual Errata not complete?

[SlyFlourish]

Yesterday I looked up the Adult Green Dragon in the D&D compendium and it was quite different from the one in my printed monster manual yet it was not listed as a change in the monster manual errata. The same is true for the Elder Green (more ongoing damage on breath. Neither is listed as a change on the Compendium yet are different than the Monster Manual. Has anyone else found discrepancies like this? Am I missing an Errata somewhere?

 

[ebertran]

I dont have the book in front of me, but what if those stats in the compendium are off the Draconomicon?

Are they different from the MM?

 

[Adso]

Yesterday I looked up the Adult Green Dragon in the D&D compendium and it was quite different from the one in my printed monster manual yet it was not listed as a change in the monster manual errata. The same is true for the Elder Green (more ongoing damage on breath. Neither is listed as a change on the Compendium yet are different than the Monster Manual. Has anyone else found discrepancies like this? Am I missing an Errata somewhere?

No you are not missing any updates to the green dragons. They were just miss keyed into the compendium. I've put in a request to update those entries.

Thanks for the question.

 

[SlyFlourish]

Doh, and I was hoping for a harder green dragon.

 

[Aberzanzorax]

Weird and wild stuff.


And unimpressive...quite frankly. I know the compendium is a "living document" but a bit of care can go a long way.

 

[doctorhook]

Weird and wild stuff.


And unimpressive...quite frankly. I know the compendium is a "living document" but a bit of care can go a long way.

Truth. I realize it's a pretty huge amount of data to inspect manually, but it's really a bummer to my confidence in the product when this most central of D&DI tools lets you down, which is semi-frequent. Plus, reporting errors is not as simple as it could be, at least not the times I've done it.