Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monster Manual: How Much Cut?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 4037087" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>Um, what? At no point did I suggest that my game was "the world", nor that these represented the monsters <em>everyone</em> would wish to see cut. Quite the contrary. I mean, if you're going to say things like that, perhaps you could quote, instead of of misleading people?</p><p></p><p>I could find games, I'm sure, where almost every monster in every MM/MC has played a very significant and long-running role. That's meaningless. So is your entirely anecdotal claim that you've seen X, Y and Z used well.</p><p></p><p>Look what I said:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Did you read that bit? I'll say it again for clarity: "I'm sure ENworld can produce anecdotes about all of them...". I put monsters I've gotten good use of on that list (Aranea, particularly), notice, because that's a list of the monsters <em>I believe </em> (however inaccurately) are relatively rarely used, without regard to whether I like them or not (admittedly, I hate Phantom Fungus <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue :P" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />). Somebody somewhere gets good use out of every monster.</p><p></p><p>That doesn't mean it needs to be in the MM1. There's only limited space in the MM1, and it needs to be used with "primary" monsters, not ones you see once in a few campaigns, and not ones that are used significantly only in one campaign in every few dozen. I know very well that your position is that you love obscure monsters, and that you love 3E and how you can apply a half-dozen templates to a monster, and that to you that's cool, but I don't understand your apparent assertion that the monsters I say can/should be cut from the MM1, shouldn't be. Well, dude, something is going to get cut? Should we cut the dragons so we can have Merfolk and Aranea?</p><p></p><p>If you, like most people, including me, would keep a few things from my list, that's cool, but do you really think that my list doesn't include a very large amount of "trimmable" monsters? To be reintroduced later, sure, but not "basics" or "essentials" or "primary" monsters, or however one wants to put it. Please recall too, that it should be much easier to make up monsters in 4E than 3E.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 4037087, member: 18"] Um, what? At no point did I suggest that my game was "the world", nor that these represented the monsters [I]everyone[/I] would wish to see cut. Quite the contrary. I mean, if you're going to say things like that, perhaps you could quote, instead of of misleading people? I could find games, I'm sure, where almost every monster in every MM/MC has played a very significant and long-running role. That's meaningless. So is your entirely anecdotal claim that you've seen X, Y and Z used well. Look what I said: Did you read that bit? I'll say it again for clarity: "I'm sure ENworld can produce anecdotes about all of them...". I put monsters I've gotten good use of on that list (Aranea, particularly), notice, because that's a list of the monsters [I]I believe [/I] (however inaccurately) are relatively rarely used, without regard to whether I like them or not (admittedly, I hate Phantom Fungus :P). Somebody somewhere gets good use out of every monster. That doesn't mean it needs to be in the MM1. There's only limited space in the MM1, and it needs to be used with "primary" monsters, not ones you see once in a few campaigns, and not ones that are used significantly only in one campaign in every few dozen. I know very well that your position is that you love obscure monsters, and that you love 3E and how you can apply a half-dozen templates to a monster, and that to you that's cool, but I don't understand your apparent assertion that the monsters I say can/should be cut from the MM1, shouldn't be. Well, dude, something is going to get cut? Should we cut the dragons so we can have Merfolk and Aranea? If you, like most people, including me, would keep a few things from my list, that's cool, but do you really think that my list doesn't include a very large amount of "trimmable" monsters? To be reintroduced later, sure, but not "basics" or "essentials" or "primary" monsters, or however one wants to put it. Please recall too, that it should be much easier to make up monsters in 4E than 3E. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monster Manual: How Much Cut?
Top