Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Desdichado" data-source="post: 318540" data-attributes="member: 2205">Re: Wayne ReynoldsDon't be afraid, and welcome!  Now, to have at your post! <img src="http://jdyal.freezope.org/evil.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />Wayne Reynolds does look very "comic book"-- the way he inks his drawings is a good sign of that, as well as his use of almost overly dramatic poses and edges, which Tiefling complains about.  I've said it before and I'll say it again, he reminds me sharpy of Marc Silvestri who used to pencil The Uncanny X-Men about 10-15 years or so ago when I was into comics.And although Sam Wood is probably my favorite D&D artist, Wayne Reynolds is definately my second favorite.  And Sam doesn't always do perfect work.  You say the fiends in MM1 look like photographs (which I don't think is true, as the lines are too easy to spot) but Wayne Reynold's glabrezu in Defenders of the Faith is tons scarier than Sam Wood's representation of the same.  And Todd Lockwood is great at dragons, but his people all look like paper-dolls that have been posed very awkwardly.Although I do agree that both Lockwood and Wood do a better job with color than WAR in general.  Despite the fact that WAR does a lot of undead and usually does them very well, he doesn't often do dark and brooding well: kinda a bright pastel instead. <img src="http://jdyal.freezope.org/ohwell.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></blockquote>

Verification