Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monster Manual - What pictures really stood out, or changed your view on a monster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stormonu" data-source="post: 6397044" data-attributes="member: 52734"><p>I have to disagree on the artwork in the MM, I really feel it missed the boat. This was an edition to get everyone back on board, and rather than get "classic" renditions of the monsters, it feels like they tried to push the art direction towards edgier designs that'd be easier to slap IP/trademarks on.</p><p></p><p>Some of the ones that really stood out: The kobold muscleman (they're Str 7!), the kraken (WTF - doesn't even resemble the old ubersquid or titan from Clash), the sheepdog pegasus, the mialee-dog gynosphinx, fishy merfolk, the cloverfield baskilisk and most of the demon/devils (worst offender: Barlgura - it used to be an orangutang, not an orange gorilla). Anyone notice that the mephits ARE IN THE SAME POSE IN EACH PICTURE (except the Mud)? Why do the yeti have ram's horns? Why does every snake-like creature have a cobra's hood? In some places, the line drawings would have been better than the completed pictures (see the Griffon). And the worst two offenders? The owlbear and the behir - I just hate them both.</p><p></p><p>Now, there were some I did like - the angels, cockatrice, merrow, centaur & chimera, quasit and the picture of Castle Ravenloft are great. The displacer beast looks sleek and fearsome. Most of the dragons are well done (exception is the red & shadow). I'm glad to see a woman-like Dryad back instead of the tree abomination. What makes me shake my head is how awesome the androsphinx looks, and how much the gynosphinx sucks. The DiTerlizzi-like modrons harken back to Planescape, but seem out of place (BTW, they were the first page I opened up to when I got the MM - made me smile).</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, most of the rest of the art falls into the meh or blech range for me. Overall, on my first glance through it, I hated the art. I had to sit back down and go picture by picture to start finding art I did like. I'm just not fond of it and while it works for the stats, the art is just - meh.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stormonu, post: 6397044, member: 52734"] I have to disagree on the artwork in the MM, I really feel it missed the boat. This was an edition to get everyone back on board, and rather than get "classic" renditions of the monsters, it feels like they tried to push the art direction towards edgier designs that'd be easier to slap IP/trademarks on. Some of the ones that really stood out: The kobold muscleman (they're Str 7!), the kraken (WTF - doesn't even resemble the old ubersquid or titan from Clash), the sheepdog pegasus, the mialee-dog gynosphinx, fishy merfolk, the cloverfield baskilisk and most of the demon/devils (worst offender: Barlgura - it used to be an orangutang, not an orange gorilla). Anyone notice that the mephits ARE IN THE SAME POSE IN EACH PICTURE (except the Mud)? Why do the yeti have ram's horns? Why does every snake-like creature have a cobra's hood? In some places, the line drawings would have been better than the completed pictures (see the Griffon). And the worst two offenders? The owlbear and the behir - I just hate them both. Now, there were some I did like - the angels, cockatrice, merrow, centaur & chimera, quasit and the picture of Castle Ravenloft are great. The displacer beast looks sleek and fearsome. Most of the dragons are well done (exception is the red & shadow). I'm glad to see a woman-like Dryad back instead of the tree abomination. What makes me shake my head is how awesome the androsphinx looks, and how much the gynosphinx sucks. The DiTerlizzi-like modrons harken back to Planescape, but seem out of place (BTW, they were the first page I opened up to when I got the MM - made me smile). Unfortunately, most of the rest of the art falls into the meh or blech range for me. Overall, on my first glance through it, I hated the art. I had to sit back down and go picture by picture to start finding art I did like. I'm just not fond of it and while it works for the stats, the art is just - meh. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monster Manual - What pictures really stood out, or changed your view on a monster?
Top