Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monster Math
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Goonalan" data-source="post: 5324687" data-attributes="member: 16069"><p>I'm a sad individual, how's that for an opening, if you check my sig you'll see the kind of thing me and my players have been up to- cataloguing every action (particularly combat) throughout KOTS, and now on Goodman Games Sellswords of Punjar. Connection rates are as follows, and this is for hundreds of attacks-</p><p></p><p>KOTS</p><p></p><p>PCs Level 1= 62.21%</p><p>Monsters= 55.29%</p><p></p><p>PCs Level 2= 64.5%</p><p>Monsters= 47.57%</p><p></p><p>That's quite a leap at Level 2, I want to see if this is sustained in other adventures- the truth is at Level 2 (and every other even Level) the PCs get another +1 To Hit (at least, sometimes +2 with their main weapon after a FEAT) and often get their hands on a +1 Weapon or Implement- it's a big jump. KOTS, imho, doesn't account for this- the encounters plateau, they get no harder, its not until the PCs are on the second level of the Keep that they increase in difficulty...</p><p></p><p>PCs Level 3= 61.72%</p><p>Monsters= 53.03%</p><p></p><p>Overall for all KOTS</p><p>PCs= 63.37%</p><p>Monsters= 52.21%</p><p></p><p>Sellswords of Punjar</p><p></p><p>Actually I'm still in the maths on this one (see sig), but its a lot closer than in KOTS, the PCs are hitting approx. 7-8% more than the monsters.</p><p></p><p>There are stats for every encounter, and I always make mention of the connection rates- in some (a few) encounters (particularly in Sellswords) the monsters connect just as often as the PCs (just), obviously you've got to remember that the PCs generally walk into a fight with the bad guys having more HP than them (discouting Healing Surges), in Encounter Level +3 and above the Monsters can have up to four times as many HP as the PCs. If the connection rate was the same for both (and damage done similar) then the PCs would just take a beating everytime and would be unable to sustain multiple encounters.</p><p></p><p>Personally, as a DM, I am fond of hitting the PCs with multiple encounters- I think twice in KOTS I combined two encounters which required the PCs quite simply to hit or die trying- titanic clashes (when used sparingly) that my players loved.</p><p></p><p>In Goodman Games scenarios imho this is much more prevelent as Encounters are generally much smaller, and much easier to overlap; if you check the Sellswords sig I think it's the third encounter the PCs get involved in- starts as a Level 1 Encounter (with 5 Level 1 PCs), by Turn #6 it has become a Level 5 Encounter, by Turn #8 Level 6 and by Turn #11 Level 7. As I say I don't do this all of the time (sparingly) but as a DM I'm aware that the PCs hit more than the monsters do, have plentiful Healing at times, and often hit hard- I'm also aware that they love these dynamic do-or-die encounters.</p><p></p><p>One last thing, regardless of connection rate, PCs die- at least that's my experience in 4e, and not just in encounters like the one mentioned above. One PC died in KOTS (McGyver the Dragonborn Paladin Level 1- best Defences in the party- failed three Death Saves), and so far in Sellswords there have been three deaths (Skamos Tiefling Wizard Level 1, Scurvy Dwarven Rogue Level 1- both failed three Death Saves & Corrin Halfling Paladin Level 1- again best Defences in the party, reduced to negative Bloodied HP).</p><p></p><p>My point is if the PCs don't hit hard and often then there chances of survival (over multiple encounters) would be much reduced- obviously that's just our game but we're playing published modules, mostly as written.</p><p></p><p>Cheers Goonalan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Goonalan, post: 5324687, member: 16069"] I'm a sad individual, how's that for an opening, if you check my sig you'll see the kind of thing me and my players have been up to- cataloguing every action (particularly combat) throughout KOTS, and now on Goodman Games Sellswords of Punjar. Connection rates are as follows, and this is for hundreds of attacks- KOTS PCs Level 1= 62.21% Monsters= 55.29% PCs Level 2= 64.5% Monsters= 47.57% That's quite a leap at Level 2, I want to see if this is sustained in other adventures- the truth is at Level 2 (and every other even Level) the PCs get another +1 To Hit (at least, sometimes +2 with their main weapon after a FEAT) and often get their hands on a +1 Weapon or Implement- it's a big jump. KOTS, imho, doesn't account for this- the encounters plateau, they get no harder, its not until the PCs are on the second level of the Keep that they increase in difficulty... PCs Level 3= 61.72% Monsters= 53.03% Overall for all KOTS PCs= 63.37% Monsters= 52.21% Sellswords of Punjar Actually I'm still in the maths on this one (see sig), but its a lot closer than in KOTS, the PCs are hitting approx. 7-8% more than the monsters. There are stats for every encounter, and I always make mention of the connection rates- in some (a few) encounters (particularly in Sellswords) the monsters connect just as often as the PCs (just), obviously you've got to remember that the PCs generally walk into a fight with the bad guys having more HP than them (discouting Healing Surges), in Encounter Level +3 and above the Monsters can have up to four times as many HP as the PCs. If the connection rate was the same for both (and damage done similar) then the PCs would just take a beating everytime and would be unable to sustain multiple encounters. Personally, as a DM, I am fond of hitting the PCs with multiple encounters- I think twice in KOTS I combined two encounters which required the PCs quite simply to hit or die trying- titanic clashes (when used sparingly) that my players loved. In Goodman Games scenarios imho this is much more prevelent as Encounters are generally much smaller, and much easier to overlap; if you check the Sellswords sig I think it's the third encounter the PCs get involved in- starts as a Level 1 Encounter (with 5 Level 1 PCs), by Turn #6 it has become a Level 5 Encounter, by Turn #8 Level 6 and by Turn #11 Level 7. As I say I don't do this all of the time (sparingly) but as a DM I'm aware that the PCs hit more than the monsters do, have plentiful Healing at times, and often hit hard- I'm also aware that they love these dynamic do-or-die encounters. One last thing, regardless of connection rate, PCs die- at least that's my experience in 4e, and not just in encounters like the one mentioned above. One PC died in KOTS (McGyver the Dragonborn Paladin Level 1- best Defences in the party- failed three Death Saves), and so far in Sellswords there have been three deaths (Skamos Tiefling Wizard Level 1, Scurvy Dwarven Rogue Level 1- both failed three Death Saves & Corrin Halfling Paladin Level 1- again best Defences in the party, reduced to negative Bloodied HP). My point is if the PCs don't hit hard and often then there chances of survival (over multiple encounters) would be much reduced- obviously that's just our game but we're playing published modules, mostly as written. Cheers Goonalan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monster Math
Top