Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monster Paralysis: Reason for Lack of Durations in OD&D, Holmes, AD&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 9365479" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Yeah, I addressed this in another post. It is a fair point, but means that the design point we are talking about isn't independent - it has other supporting design points, and the thing must be evaluated as a structure.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I understand that there are different forms of fun. However, I think this is a bit blithe.</p><p></p><p>I like having folks over to dinner. I also sometimes actually like doing yardwork. What you're suggesting is that, when folks <em>expect</em> to be sitting down to dinner with friends, that It is a <em>good</em> plan for the dinner party to randomly shove someone out of the house with a rake to bag up leaves alone.</p><p></p><p>Your uncle <em>chose</em> to go sit outside. The player of Wograff the Barbarian didn't <em>choose</em> to get paralyzed and have to sit on his thumbs for an hour or more until the combat was over. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I got into D&D with 1e. I don't generally have to listen to grognards to tell me how lethal the game was or wasn't, 'cuz I was there at the time. The play I recall wasn't as lethal as all that. However, the play I recall did have those long, boring spans for people who suffered one of those long-lasting issues. </p><p></p><p>Back then, we were young, and didn't have the experience or game design chops to build our own solutions to the issues we had with the game. But game design <em>itself</em> was young, and inexperienced. I am really not surprised that design has moved on.</p><p></p><p>To go on with an analogy that I am sure will fall apart eventually but... design has moved on from Model T cars, too.</p><p></p><p>That doesn't say that there aren't folks who like maintaining and driving Model T cars. But do we really claim that the model T is what we call "good automotive design" today? Accepting that there's always a bit of fashion to be found in design, there are technical aspects to it as well that have more objective measures attached to them. Do we have to say that so long as <em>someone</em> likes it, it is overall a good design, technical aspects be darned?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 9365479, member: 177"] Yeah, I addressed this in another post. It is a fair point, but means that the design point we are talking about isn't independent - it has other supporting design points, and the thing must be evaluated as a structure. I understand that there are different forms of fun. However, I think this is a bit blithe. I like having folks over to dinner. I also sometimes actually like doing yardwork. What you're suggesting is that, when folks [I]expect[/I] to be sitting down to dinner with friends, that It is a [I]good[/I] plan for the dinner party to randomly shove someone out of the house with a rake to bag up leaves alone. Your uncle [I]chose[/I] to go sit outside. The player of Wograff the Barbarian didn't [I]choose[/I] to get paralyzed and have to sit on his thumbs for an hour or more until the combat was over. I got into D&D with 1e. I don't generally have to listen to grognards to tell me how lethal the game was or wasn't, 'cuz I was there at the time. The play I recall wasn't as lethal as all that. However, the play I recall did have those long, boring spans for people who suffered one of those long-lasting issues. Back then, we were young, and didn't have the experience or game design chops to build our own solutions to the issues we had with the game. But game design [I]itself[/I] was young, and inexperienced. I am really not surprised that design has moved on. To go on with an analogy that I am sure will fall apart eventually but... design has moved on from Model T cars, too. That doesn't say that there aren't folks who like maintaining and driving Model T cars. But do we really claim that the model T is what we call "good automotive design" today? Accepting that there's always a bit of fashion to be found in design, there are technical aspects to it as well that have more objective measures attached to them. Do we have to say that so long as [I]someone[/I] likes it, it is overall a good design, technical aspects be darned? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monster Paralysis: Reason for Lack of Durations in OD&D, Holmes, AD&D
Top