Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Eternity Publishing Hosted Forum
Monster Request Thread!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EarthSeraphEdna" data-source="post: 3793605" data-attributes="member: 49309"><p>Well, the bestiary itself states: </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So yes, unless U_K has changed the rules regarding size category dimensions, a spherical creature with a 6-foot-diameter would be Large size, a 12-foot-diameter sphere would be Huge size, etc. However, I don't exactly agree with this due to the rule conflicting with the approximate weight for size categories.</p><p></p><p>Using the formula for the volume of a sphere, [(4/3) * pi * r^3], we get a volume of 905 cubic feet for a 12-foot-diameter sphere (12 feet is the average prime dimension of a creature of Large size). The Bestiary states that 1.2 grams per cubic centimeter is the standard density of a creature with average strength for its size, which converts to about 75 pounds per cubic foot. Thus, a 12-foot-diameter sphere made of organic flesh and bone would weight 67,865 pounds or 34 tons. This is within the weight range of a Gargantuan creature. Thus, a 12-foot-diameter sphere would normally be considered Gargantuan instead of large, a +2 size increase.</p><p></p><p>Let's try that again with a 96-foot-diameter sphere (96 feet is the average prime dimension of a creature of Colossal size). Using the volume for the formula of a sphere, we get a volume of 463,433 cubic feet. Multiply that by 75 pounds per cubic foot to account for flesh and bone composition and we get a mass of 34,757,475 pounds or 17,378 tons, which is within the range of a Macro-Fine creature.</p><p></p><p>The same goes for cubical creatures. A 12-foot cube of flesh and bone would have a volume of 1728 cubic feet and a mass of 129,600 pounds or 65 tons, just within the range of a Gargantuan creature. A 96-foot cube of flesh and bone would have a volume of 884,736 cubic feet and a mass of 66,335,200 pounds or 33,178 tons, within the range of a Macro-Fine creature.</p><p></p><p>From this we can see that a spherical or cubical creature is two size categories above a regularly-proportioned creature. However, should they be two size categories larger in all respects, or should they be given +2 VSCs instead? In other words, would a 96-foot-diameter sphere of flesh and bone be considered a Macro-Fine creature or a Colossal creature with +2 VSCs? Furthermore, (as was asked in my previous question), what would be the slam (parallel to the ground) and crush (against the ground) damage of this 96-foot-diameter sphere, and would the damage values change if it were a 96-foot cube instead (assume the cube is ramming using its corners or flat sides, whichever you deem to be more damaging)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EarthSeraphEdna, post: 3793605, member: 49309"] Well, the bestiary itself states: So yes, unless U_K has changed the rules regarding size category dimensions, a spherical creature with a 6-foot-diameter would be Large size, a 12-foot-diameter sphere would be Huge size, etc. However, I don't exactly agree with this due to the rule conflicting with the approximate weight for size categories. Using the formula for the volume of a sphere, [(4/3) * pi * r^3], we get a volume of 905 cubic feet for a 12-foot-diameter sphere (12 feet is the average prime dimension of a creature of Large size). The Bestiary states that 1.2 grams per cubic centimeter is the standard density of a creature with average strength for its size, which converts to about 75 pounds per cubic foot. Thus, a 12-foot-diameter sphere made of organic flesh and bone would weight 67,865 pounds or 34 tons. This is within the weight range of a Gargantuan creature. Thus, a 12-foot-diameter sphere would normally be considered Gargantuan instead of large, a +2 size increase. Let's try that again with a 96-foot-diameter sphere (96 feet is the average prime dimension of a creature of Colossal size). Using the volume for the formula of a sphere, we get a volume of 463,433 cubic feet. Multiply that by 75 pounds per cubic foot to account for flesh and bone composition and we get a mass of 34,757,475 pounds or 17,378 tons, which is within the range of a Macro-Fine creature. The same goes for cubical creatures. A 12-foot cube of flesh and bone would have a volume of 1728 cubic feet and a mass of 129,600 pounds or 65 tons, just within the range of a Gargantuan creature. A 96-foot cube of flesh and bone would have a volume of 884,736 cubic feet and a mass of 66,335,200 pounds or 33,178 tons, within the range of a Macro-Fine creature. From this we can see that a spherical or cubical creature is two size categories above a regularly-proportioned creature. However, should they be two size categories larger in all respects, or should they be given +2 VSCs instead? In other words, would a 96-foot-diameter sphere of flesh and bone be considered a Macro-Fine creature or a Colossal creature with +2 VSCs? Furthermore, (as was asked in my previous question), what would be the slam (parallel to the ground) and crush (against the ground) damage of this 96-foot-diameter sphere, and would the damage values change if it were a 96-foot cube instead (assume the cube is ramming using its corners or flat sides, whichever you deem to be more damaging)? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Eternity Publishing Hosted Forum
Monster Request Thread!!!
Top