Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monsters As Encounters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 3872007" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>KM: Compared to the way I originally understood your post, the term 'monster encounter' is being interpreted in an increasingly narrow fashion. For example, Exen Trik's post seems to interpret 'monster encounter' to be only applicable to trans-collosus monsters. This makes the idea of 'monster encounter' to be of extremely narrow usage. In the case of the examples he cites, the 'monster encounter' is really a series of individual encounters with various monsters and environmental hazards which share the common 'fluff' of being part of a single mega-organism.</p><p></p><p>This is far more narrow than I understood your initial post to cover. For one thing, when you said 'sea serpant', I assumed that you were referring to sea serpants generally, and not merely to trans-collosus leviathans say 1500' in length. The encounter as you describe it could basically be run with any sea serpant of sufficient size to plausibly bash the boat that the players are being transported in. For example, you could run basically the same encounter with a large alligator if the PC's where boating in a canoe.</p><p></p><p>My first complaint can be basically summed up as, "Isn't every monster more interesting as a multi-layered scene, rather than a simple straight-up fight?" Yet, even though this is true, isn't it equally obvious that 'fight' is an option within the scene at some point?</p><p></p><p></p><p>My second complaint is that the less trans-collosus that the monster is, the more obvious it is that at some point you might need traditional stat blocks because the more likely that it is that the monster is within 8 EL's of the PC's and can be challenged directly as soon as the PC's come up with a plan to deal with the unusual nature of the water dweller's attack. More to the point, at some point, even the trans collosus 1500' long leviathan is something that a PC party realistically can effect. A stat block serves as an arbitrator of a parties interactions with the monster. Without a stat block, you are essentially riding entirely on DM fiat, including the DM fiat that 'this monster cannot be effected by anything that the PC's do'. Now granted, the game is not really set up to deal with huge differences in scale like what you describe, and you might need some special abilities to capture the flavor of really really huge well, and it might even be good if there were a set of standardized rules for all trans-collossal creatures (some sort of supplement), but I don't see how stats become obselete just because things get big. At some point, isn't the DM going to have to make calls like, 'Is the DR of this creature 30/- or 50/-?' 'Does it have 10,000 hit points or 15,000?', 'How fast can it move?' and so forth. The alternative is to just wing it, yank the PC's chain, and risk (as you put it) 'abusing the PCs'.</p><p></p><p>I'm not very fond of the notion of encounters as putting the PC's on a railroad, which is what a statless encounter seems to imply.</p><p></p><p>And you seem to agree, since you say, among other things:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Isn't this going pretty darn close to having a stat block?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 3872007, member: 4937"] KM: Compared to the way I originally understood your post, the term 'monster encounter' is being interpreted in an increasingly narrow fashion. For example, Exen Trik's post seems to interpret 'monster encounter' to be only applicable to trans-collosus monsters. This makes the idea of 'monster encounter' to be of extremely narrow usage. In the case of the examples he cites, the 'monster encounter' is really a series of individual encounters with various monsters and environmental hazards which share the common 'fluff' of being part of a single mega-organism. This is far more narrow than I understood your initial post to cover. For one thing, when you said 'sea serpant', I assumed that you were referring to sea serpants generally, and not merely to trans-collosus leviathans say 1500' in length. The encounter as you describe it could basically be run with any sea serpant of sufficient size to plausibly bash the boat that the players are being transported in. For example, you could run basically the same encounter with a large alligator if the PC's where boating in a canoe. My first complaint can be basically summed up as, "Isn't every monster more interesting as a multi-layered scene, rather than a simple straight-up fight?" Yet, even though this is true, isn't it equally obvious that 'fight' is an option within the scene at some point? My second complaint is that the less trans-collosus that the monster is, the more obvious it is that at some point you might need traditional stat blocks because the more likely that it is that the monster is within 8 EL's of the PC's and can be challenged directly as soon as the PC's come up with a plan to deal with the unusual nature of the water dweller's attack. More to the point, at some point, even the trans collosus 1500' long leviathan is something that a PC party realistically can effect. A stat block serves as an arbitrator of a parties interactions with the monster. Without a stat block, you are essentially riding entirely on DM fiat, including the DM fiat that 'this monster cannot be effected by anything that the PC's do'. Now granted, the game is not really set up to deal with huge differences in scale like what you describe, and you might need some special abilities to capture the flavor of really really huge well, and it might even be good if there were a set of standardized rules for all trans-collossal creatures (some sort of supplement), but I don't see how stats become obselete just because things get big. At some point, isn't the DM going to have to make calls like, 'Is the DR of this creature 30/- or 50/-?' 'Does it have 10,000 hit points or 15,000?', 'How fast can it move?' and so forth. The alternative is to just wing it, yank the PC's chain, and risk (as you put it) 'abusing the PCs'. I'm not very fond of the notion of encounters as putting the PC's on a railroad, which is what a statless encounter seems to imply. And you seem to agree, since you say, among other things: Isn't this going pretty darn close to having a stat block? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monsters As Encounters
Top