Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 6131697" data-attributes="member: 2067">Once again:They have never been servants of the evil gods.Asking them to be that is like asking goblins to be noble faerie knights. It's not something that has ever been a part of the creature. There's no reason it needs to become part of the creature. Once again: <a href="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4wand/20120911" target="_blank">seafaring minotaurs are likely going to be part of what the core minotaurs are</a>. If you'd like to react to the points I'm making, that'd make for a much more engaging conversation than simply making the same assertions over and over again. You keep ignoring the fact that core drow and Eberron drow (and minotaurs and giths and halflings and gnomes whatever) aren't really incompatible.It IS rejected because it's PS incompatible. But if Dragonlance fans are getting their minotaur and Dark Sun fans are getting their halfling and Eberron fans are getting their drow, and spelljammer fans have their space elves, why shouldn't PS fans have their yugoloths? Why is PS the only setting that it's OK for the publishers of D&D to say "Your fiction is incompatible with the core"? I get that you've drunk the haterade on the setting (all well and good), but it sounds like you're letting your hate obscure your reason, here. There's no conspiracy to force the taint of Planescape into your home games. If you don't like yugoloths, you ain't gotta use them, just like the millions of fans who won't use gully dwarves. Nothing PS-related needs to touch your little setting.</blockquote>

Verification