Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 6132797" data-attributes="member: 2067">That's only true if 4e eladrin are the only eladrin (like they mostly were in 4e). If, instead, they are one variety of eladrin, that leaves room for the other varieties of eladrin without any problem, right there in the MM.Same with the minotaurs: if Krynn's minotaurs are one variety of minotaur, that leaves room for other varieties of minotaur, right there in the MM. Or halflings: if kender are one variety of halfling, they don't need to be the only one.The proposals leave room for multivalence. Ah, but with the 'loths: if they are defined as "servants of the evil gods," that doesn't leave any room for PS yugoloths. That's a problem. That's telling those who like PS yugoloths that they can't play with the rest of the kids. That's unnecessary, and pointless to boot.</blockquote>