Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 6133074" data-attributes="member: 92511">*Bold/Emphasis mine.Thanks gyor. So, basically, you're saying there are no evil god servitors established in D&D "canon/core." Thank you. That is quite useful, and what I personally thought to be the case.  annnnd, no one is telling them that. They [we] are telling them, if you want kender, GO LOOK IN A DRAGONLANCE/KRYNN BOOK NOT THE CORE MM! I hope,very much, there is one...have all the krynnish-minotaur-pirate-kender-tinker-gnome-maelstrom-ishtar-solace-raistlin-wannabes and solomnian-knights-towers-of-high-sorcery fun you WANT! No one is disputing, infringing or standing in your way to your right to go do that!And, again, nooooo. A Dragonlance game is not a D&D game...it's a game set in the Dragonlance setting, which is an intellectual property owned by D&D, yes... but not the same as a game set in the Forgotten Realms Setting...or the Ravenloft setting...or...the Planecape setting. Maybe yours. Not mine. Kender are a part of Krynn. Yes. If you play D&D in Krynn, then sure, kender are a part of YOUR D&D.Like the decades of writing in place for what a high elf was? No? Something different you mean? Follow that lil' gem's reasoning?Well, since this is directly related to the whole daemons as serving the gods nonsense (that no one is actually arguing about), let's take a peek at gyor's thorough explanation above, shall we?What, exactly, in the "decades of writing that is already in place" am I supposed to find that tells me where/who serves the evil gods? Cuz a few posts now have basically said, there's no one specific that does that. 1) I'll thank you, moderator or no, not to raise your voice to me. <thunder rumble> Do not take me for some conjurer of cheap tricks! <rumbles away>2) I am fairly well educated, thank you...and to the point of the discussion, regarding D&D it seems there are no servitors of evil gods, so I think I'm fairly well educated on the matter. Thank you.and 3) I have no idea what your last sentence is supposed to mean.<rolls eyes> It wasn't a "personal attack." I think you are being honest...as you see it...I simply don't think that what you respond to is always what is being said. You do have a knack for ignoring and/or editing out bits of posts that either don't serve your argument or, I can only suppose, you have no response to. That's not being "dishonest" but, as I said, willfully ignoring or avoiding points that are being made. I don't see how that mandates my "stepping out of the conversation."</blockquote>

Verification