Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monsters of Many Names - Wandering Monsters (Yugoloth!)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 6133230" data-attributes="member: 92511"><p>"Interesting" to whom? "Fun to play with" for whom?</p><p></p><p>When did you become arbiter of what is fun or interesting for all of D&Ddom? Wish I'd known. I'd've sent flowers...or a congratulatory coffee mug or something...maybe a hat. One can never have too many hats, gloves and shoes...<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>..huh? What was I saying? Oh yeah...</p><p></p><p>...and I don't believe anyone has suggested taking away their mercenary tendencies. That's not really part of the discussion, just thought I'd make that clear.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Fair enough. I misspoke [it was rather late/early]. Yes, they are playing D&D...in Dragonlance. My point was that Dragonlance is not<em> the </em>D&D game. It is <em>A</em> D&D game. Like Eberron is <em>a</em> D&D game or FR or PS or or or. And I can play D&D not in ANY of those settings. The assumptions of <em>a setting</em> of D&D should not be included in the core of the game. That's all I'm trying to get across.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>"local design" TL/DR. Can you explain what you're trying to say in 50 words or less? And what "coming down on the side of the 2e MM" means? I also am not following your "illustration"...might be the sleep deprivation, but I'm not sure that's entirely why.</p><p></p><p>Why/how is it artificial or irrelevant? Kender are from the Dragonlance setting. They belong in Dragonlance, not core. Yugoloths of a certain lore are from Planescape. They belong in PS, not core. That's where/what they were created for. I don't see how that is 'artificial irrelevant distinction'. No one's trying to "take your kender or yugoloths away." Simply put/keep them where they belong. Make everything nice n' tidy.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>uh...huh....Well I guess, according to this lovely diagram, I would move the kender to be completely within the Dragonlance circle. They only have relevance within that circle. They do not exist outside of it. They were created, specifically, for that setting. Still puts them in the D&D circle...but I don't see what the point of this is. They have no purpose or use outside of that setting. The Dragonlance circle goes inside the D&D circle...it was created b it, for it. It does not have an existence or relevance outside of D&D...so, in fact, as I see it, it looks like you <em>can't </em>actually make a Venn diagram about it, cuz the circles just all sit within each other, not overlapping.</p><p></p><p>I could make the exact same diagram using Planescape instead of Dragonlance and PS Yugoloths instead of Kender. The results are/would be the same. The daemons go IN, all the way in not "overlapping", PS. </p><p></p><p>And/or, better yet, a diagram where Dragonlance and Planescape are separate circles...BOTH within D&D. The PS circle is in D&D, within which are god-hating yugoloths...next to the circle of Dragonlance, within which are kender and pirate minotaurs...next to the circle of Eberron, within which are warforged and electro-magic trains...and a circle for FR and a circle for Greyhawk and a circle for every other setting and homebrew out there. I suppose, since PS was deliberately a meta-setting, a bunch of those other circles would be inside of PS...but be that as it may...All of the space that is NOT within one of those setting circles...but those setting rings are floating around in...that's the core of D&D. </p><p></p><p>Are we going to have an issue now about where I'm expecting/preferring the circles are put? Am I not doing it "right"?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="steeldragons, post: 6133230, member: 92511"] "Interesting" to whom? "Fun to play with" for whom? When did you become arbiter of what is fun or interesting for all of D&Ddom? Wish I'd known. I'd've sent flowers...or a congratulatory coffee mug or something...maybe a hat. One can never have too many hats, gloves and shoes...;) ..huh? What was I saying? Oh yeah... ...and I don't believe anyone has suggested taking away their mercenary tendencies. That's not really part of the discussion, just thought I'd make that clear. Fair enough. I misspoke [it was rather late/early]. Yes, they are playing D&D...in Dragonlance. My point was that Dragonlance is not[I] the [/I]D&D game. It is [I]A[/I] D&D game. Like Eberron is [I]a[/I] D&D game or FR or PS or or or. And I can play D&D not in ANY of those settings. The assumptions of [I]a setting[/I] of D&D should not be included in the core of the game. That's all I'm trying to get across. "local design" TL/DR. Can you explain what you're trying to say in 50 words or less? And what "coming down on the side of the 2e MM" means? I also am not following your "illustration"...might be the sleep deprivation, but I'm not sure that's entirely why. Why/how is it artificial or irrelevant? Kender are from the Dragonlance setting. They belong in Dragonlance, not core. Yugoloths of a certain lore are from Planescape. They belong in PS, not core. That's where/what they were created for. I don't see how that is 'artificial irrelevant distinction'. No one's trying to "take your kender or yugoloths away." Simply put/keep them where they belong. Make everything nice n' tidy. uh...huh....Well I guess, according to this lovely diagram, I would move the kender to be completely within the Dragonlance circle. They only have relevance within that circle. They do not exist outside of it. They were created, specifically, for that setting. Still puts them in the D&D circle...but I don't see what the point of this is. They have no purpose or use outside of that setting. The Dragonlance circle goes inside the D&D circle...it was created b it, for it. It does not have an existence or relevance outside of D&D...so, in fact, as I see it, it looks like you [I]can't [/I]actually make a Venn diagram about it, cuz the circles just all sit within each other, not overlapping. I could make the exact same diagram using Planescape instead of Dragonlance and PS Yugoloths instead of Kender. The results are/would be the same. The daemons go IN, all the way in not "overlapping", PS. And/or, better yet, a diagram where Dragonlance and Planescape are separate circles...BOTH within D&D. The PS circle is in D&D, within which are god-hating yugoloths...next to the circle of Dragonlance, within which are kender and pirate minotaurs...next to the circle of Eberron, within which are warforged and electro-magic trains...and a circle for FR and a circle for Greyhawk and a circle for every other setting and homebrew out there. I suppose, since PS was deliberately a meta-setting, a bunch of those other circles would be inside of PS...but be that as it may...All of the space that is NOT within one of those setting circles...but those setting rings are floating around in...that's the core of D&D. Are we going to have an issue now about where I'm expecting/preferring the circles are put? Am I not doing it "right"? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Monsters of Many Names - Wandering Monsters (Yugoloth!)
Top