Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monster's Primary Attack = Single Attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="daemonslye" data-source="post: 280910" data-attributes="member: 6309"><p>Here is a question I thought had a simple answer; However, I cannot find a clear answer in the rules:</p><p></p><p>My current DM's supposition: "Primary weapons are considered a </p><p>single attack." Referring to a monster's primary natural weapons and the ability to use all primary weapons without a full-round action.</p><p></p><p>Now, I thought the MM was clear: </p><p></p><p>- > ------------------------------------------</p><p>- > MMp7: ATTACKS</p><p>- > Natural Weapons: <blather about attack</p><p>- > bonuses for natural weapons></p><p>- > "...All of the foregoing assumes that the</p><p>- > creature makes a full attack (see Attack</p><p>- > Actions, page 122 in the Players Handbook)</p><p>- > and employs its natural weapons. If a creature</p><p>- > instead chooses the attack option (and thus</p><p>- > makes only a single attack), it uses its</p><p>- > primary attack bonus."</p><p>- > ------------------------------------------</p><p>- > PHp122: ATTACK ACTIONS</p><p>- > Attack</p><p>- > "The attack action is a standard action. You</p><p>- > can move and then make a single attack, or</p><p>- > attack and then move."</p><p>- > ------------------------------------------</p><p></p><p>However, what if we look at the description of the Hydra:</p><p></p><p>- > ------------------------------------------</p><p>- > MMp122: COMBAT</p><p>- > "Hydras attack with all of their heads at no penalty</p><p>- > even if they move or charge during a round."</p><p>- > ------------------------------------------</p><p></p><p>Yikes. So that throws the "single attack" question into</p><p>dispute. In addition, though AOOs are not mentioned </p><p>these could be construed to fall under the same rule</p><p>(couple that with reach and I am running the other way</p><p>from anything hydra or retriever like).</p><p></p><p>Thanks for helping clear up this issue.</p><p></p><p>~D</p><p></p><p>DMs Supposition (after I asked him to look into the rules):</p><p>- "I spent more time reading and thinking through this and came </p><p>- to the same conclusion. Primary weapons are considered a </p><p>- single attack. This is even reflected in the MM stats by the </p><p>- fact that secondary weapons are made at a -5. In other </p><p>- words, for natural weapons, the attack bonuses would be 0/-5 </p><p>- (no including size and strength bonuses) such that all </p><p>- primary weapons are used in a single attack at +0, and </p><p>- secondary weapon attacks are made at -5. This compares to </p><p>- "manufactured weapons" for a barbarian with say +6/+1 in </p><p>- which two attacks (being made *in sequence*) could be made </p><p>- only if the full attack option is taken."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="daemonslye, post: 280910, member: 6309"] Here is a question I thought had a simple answer; However, I cannot find a clear answer in the rules: My current DM's supposition: "Primary weapons are considered a single attack." Referring to a monster's primary natural weapons and the ability to use all primary weapons without a full-round action. Now, I thought the MM was clear: - > ------------------------------------------ - > MMp7: ATTACKS - > Natural Weapons: <blather about attack - > bonuses for natural weapons> - > "...All of the foregoing assumes that the - > creature makes a full attack (see Attack - > Actions, page 122 in the Players Handbook) - > and employs its natural weapons. If a creature - > instead chooses the attack option (and thus - > makes only a single attack), it uses its - > primary attack bonus." - > ------------------------------------------ - > PHp122: ATTACK ACTIONS - > Attack - > "The attack action is a standard action. You - > can move and then make a single attack, or - > attack and then move." - > ------------------------------------------ However, what if we look at the description of the Hydra: - > ------------------------------------------ - > MMp122: COMBAT - > "Hydras attack with all of their heads at no penalty - > even if they move or charge during a round." - > ------------------------------------------ Yikes. So that throws the "single attack" question into dispute. In addition, though AOOs are not mentioned these could be construed to fall under the same rule (couple that with reach and I am running the other way from anything hydra or retriever like). Thanks for helping clear up this issue. ~D DMs Supposition (after I asked him to look into the rules): - "I spent more time reading and thinking through this and came - to the same conclusion. Primary weapons are considered a - single attack. This is even reflected in the MM stats by the - fact that secondary weapons are made at a -5. In other - words, for natural weapons, the attack bonuses would be 0/-5 - (no including size and strength bonuses) such that all - primary weapons are used in a single attack at +0, and - secondary weapon attacks are made at -5. This compares to - "manufactured weapons" for a barbarian with say +6/+1 in - which two attacks (being made *in sequence*) could be made - only if the full attack option is taken." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monster's Primary Attack = Single Attack
Top