Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monsters with spell lists is not a good sign
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Transformer" data-source="post: 5920624" data-attributes="member: 70008"><p>This is a colossal practical problem for most groups. One person controls a PC, and that person has controlled that PC from the beginning and knows its abilities inside and out. a DM has to control multiple monsters as well as run everything else in the game, and frequently he's using a given monster for only the first or second time. In other words, there is a clear, huge, practical reasons why PCs have spells lists and monsters must not.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Definitely, having content duplicated is annoying. There is a constant trade-off between duplicating content and not including everything in a place where it is a useful reference. The only question is where the balance lies. I would say with monsters with complex, detailed spells and abilities, the balance easily lies on the side of needing it as a reference within the monster stat block. DM prep time and combat length are <em>massively</em> increased otherwise. </p><p></p><p>I agree monsters going over one page is a pain. I don't think they'll have to with a concise 4e-style statblock, even with added environmental and lore information.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, definitely, many (most?) DM regularly use stat blocks right out of the book. Reworking every stat block takes time, lots of time, even if the system facilitates it well. And sure the monsters are average for the fantasy world of the game, but are they "average" for the players (i.e., have the players seen that particular stat block before many times, so it's old hat and boring)? That's unlikely; to the players even the average monster (in the game world) is still interesting.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm normally a bit less direct when I post on here, but this is too important a practical issue to hedge on. It is absolutely a dealbreaker for tons of DMs. If I'd have to manually look up half a dozen spells during combat (or in prep for a game) just to run an interesting magical monster, I would not run that system. It's just too much of a colossal pain. A one or two line summary of every spell-like ability a monster has is an absolute must for a usable monster manual. This is one area where 4e was a massive, super-practical, game-changing improvement. I'm not going back.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Transformer, post: 5920624, member: 70008"] This is a colossal practical problem for most groups. One person controls a PC, and that person has controlled that PC from the beginning and knows its abilities inside and out. a DM has to control multiple monsters as well as run everything else in the game, and frequently he's using a given monster for only the first or second time. In other words, there is a clear, huge, practical reasons why PCs have spells lists and monsters must not. Definitely, having content duplicated is annoying. There is a constant trade-off between duplicating content and not including everything in a place where it is a useful reference. The only question is where the balance lies. I would say with monsters with complex, detailed spells and abilities, the balance easily lies on the side of needing it as a reference within the monster stat block. DM prep time and combat length are [I]massively[/I] increased otherwise. I agree monsters going over one page is a pain. I don't think they'll have to with a concise 4e-style statblock, even with added environmental and lore information. Yes, definitely, many (most?) DM regularly use stat blocks right out of the book. Reworking every stat block takes time, lots of time, even if the system facilitates it well. And sure the monsters are average for the fantasy world of the game, but are they "average" for the players (i.e., have the players seen that particular stat block before many times, so it's old hat and boring)? That's unlikely; to the players even the average monster (in the game world) is still interesting. I'm normally a bit less direct when I post on here, but this is too important a practical issue to hedge on. It is absolutely a dealbreaker for tons of DMs. If I'd have to manually look up half a dozen spells during combat (or in prep for a game) just to run an interesting magical monster, I would not run that system. It's just too much of a colossal pain. A one or two line summary of every spell-like ability a monster has is an absolute must for a usable monster manual. This is one area where 4e was a massive, super-practical, game-changing improvement. I'm not going back. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monsters with spell lists is not a good sign
Top