Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scion" data-source="post: 1922607" data-attributes="member: 5777">like I said though, magical things already tend to resize.So, what benefit does wild have over glamor?Also, I think that the wording 'does' make the shield dissapear, and allows the use of all limbs. After all, the druid can shift into things which 'cannot' hold the shield and the ability goes out of its way to name 3 different things, the third of which I believe is meant to include the previous 2.That isnt a big deal though, I am just wondering what benefit you see the wild enhancement providing. Especially to shields (as of right now it seems there would be no reason at all to get it instead of animated for the way you are reading it, it is still visible, it takes up an arm or something, and it costs more).I know you said that it makes it useful to different forms, but you also said that it takes up the bears arm, which means it is much less useful than other things.That sort of thing doesnt really make sense to me <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I feel that wild is designed to make the armor and shield look like they are not there, allow a full range of abilities, but still keeping all of the armor check penalies, movement restrictions, and special problems, other than being seen.Otherwise, it just isnt very worthwhile.</blockquote>

Verification