Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scion" data-source="post: 1923116" data-attributes="member: 5777">From what it seems like you were saying before glamor would actually do 'more'.Note that you are responding to the wrong person, I said nothing about the armore check penalties going away, in fact I thought I remembered an faq about the restrictions of the armor still staying along with the armor bonus, but nothing else.I have even made it a point of saying that the armor check penalties would still be immense.Hence why I said that you are quoting the wrong individual. You will want to point these comments at Dr. Awkward, enjoy.Actually, like I said before, it mentions three things: a suit of armor, shield, armor.I feel that the last takes into account both of the previous, as it does not specify suit of armor as it did earlier and it is true that a shield is a type of armor. Whether the last is specifying something directly with the proper vernacular or it is being loos with the language, either way though I still believe that the shield melds. Anything else would lead to very, very odd results. Especially as animated would be simply better in effectively every way.</blockquote>