Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="keterys" data-source="post: 5046352" data-attributes="member: 43019">I think the expertise feats are broken, no matter how it's argued. If they're helpful for the game, it should just be errata. If they're not helpful, they shouldn't exist. No matter what, +3 to hit from a feat is too much, and that to-hit only apply for certain weapon types or power types is just damn poor design. Which group am I? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Even bypassing that for a second... I think both of the following:1) Mathematically, there is a disparity between defenses and attack bonuses at very high level, so some fix to maintain sweet spot is laudable.2) Monsters do not do nearly enough damage and combats are not nearly threatening enough as you get higher levelStick to just trying to make a good simulation, and don't worry about trying to prove anything vis a vis expertise through survivability. It's just not meaningful.</blockquote>