Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monte Cook back at wizards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shemeska" data-source="post: 5688310" data-attributes="member: 11697"><p>This will be interesting. Assuming that they're now (or have been for a while) working on a 5e, they're in a really awkward position regarding what sort of thing to release to try to reclaim anything resembling their previous era market share.</p><p></p><p>If they release something more in line with pre-4e design notions, will they regain much of the 3.x crowd that either went with PF or never stopped playing 3.x? The ship may have sailed there unless they reverse course hard and gut many of the 4e'isms. Yet if they do that they risk starting Nerd Rage War II and having the people who didn't like 3.x and adore 4e feeling betrayed - and based on comments over on the WotC forums a number of people are already lighting torches and grabbing pitchforks in the event that WotC "backslides".</p><p></p><p>Mind you, this doesn't really impact me much. I've got a preferred edition that I play, which WotC doesn't make, so the route they go has little influence on my gaming at this juncture. Yet if anyone could find a solution for WotC that doesn't involve them losing even more of a market they splintered, Monte could, assuming he would have the creative freedom to abandon things that failed to gain traction in the RPG marketplace regardless of internal feelings at WotC about some of those design elements. It'll be difficult if not impossible.</p><p></p><p>Would be hard to get my money though, unless for instance they gave Monte a budget and let him do a 5e Planescape true to the original setting, its metaplot and design elements without having to adhere to 4e PoL at all. Yeah, that I'd throw money at WotC for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shemeska, post: 5688310, member: 11697"] This will be interesting. Assuming that they're now (or have been for a while) working on a 5e, they're in a really awkward position regarding what sort of thing to release to try to reclaim anything resembling their previous era market share. If they release something more in line with pre-4e design notions, will they regain much of the 3.x crowd that either went with PF or never stopped playing 3.x? The ship may have sailed there unless they reverse course hard and gut many of the 4e'isms. Yet if they do that they risk starting Nerd Rage War II and having the people who didn't like 3.x and adore 4e feeling betrayed - and based on comments over on the WotC forums a number of people are already lighting torches and grabbing pitchforks in the event that WotC "backslides". Mind you, this doesn't really impact me much. I've got a preferred edition that I play, which WotC doesn't make, so the route they go has little influence on my gaming at this juncture. Yet if anyone could find a solution for WotC that doesn't involve them losing even more of a market they splintered, Monte could, assuming he would have the creative freedom to abandon things that failed to gain traction in the RPG marketplace regardless of internal feelings at WotC about some of those design elements. It'll be difficult if not impossible. Would be hard to get my money though, unless for instance they gave Monte a budget and let him do a 5e Planescape true to the original setting, its metaplot and design elements without having to adhere to 4e PoL at all. Yeah, that I'd throw money at WotC for. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monte Cook back at wizards
Top