Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monte Cook: Guidance for Monsters and Treasure
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 5859449" data-attributes="member: 3424"><p>What I'm not seeing is how this restricts the DM at all. Fairly simplistically put, there are four variables in this system: PC power, magic item power, monster power and level of challenge. The system doesn't (and can't!) force a DM to give specific magic items to the PCs or throw specific challenges at them. However, if three out of the four variables are specified, basic math pretty much determines the fourth (although the DM can always apply situational factors to specific encounters).</p><p></p><p>If PC power is given, and the DM wants the PCs to encounter a specific monster and he wants the fight to provide a specific level of challenge, then yes, he needs to ensure that the PC's magic items are of a specific level of power (or adjust the situational factors). If, however, he is willing to change either the monster power or the level of difficulty, he can keep magic item power constant. </p><p></p><p>Given this set-up, I think it is fine for a system to advise what is the baseline assumption, e.g. PCs of a particular power level equipped with standard magic items for their level should be able to take on monsters of a particular power level at a standard level of challenge. Maybe it could also explain how reducing magic item power will change the level of challenge if monster power remains constant, or how monster power can be adjusted to maintain the same level of challenge. However, I don't see the fact that such advice exists as "restrictive" or as "funnelling".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 5859449, member: 3424"] What I'm not seeing is how this restricts the DM at all. Fairly simplistically put, there are four variables in this system: PC power, magic item power, monster power and level of challenge. The system doesn't (and can't!) force a DM to give specific magic items to the PCs or throw specific challenges at them. However, if three out of the four variables are specified, basic math pretty much determines the fourth (although the DM can always apply situational factors to specific encounters). If PC power is given, and the DM wants the PCs to encounter a specific monster and he wants the fight to provide a specific level of challenge, then yes, he needs to ensure that the PC's magic items are of a specific level of power (or adjust the situational factors). If, however, he is willing to change either the monster power or the level of difficulty, he can keep magic item power constant. Given this set-up, I think it is fine for a system to advise what is the baseline assumption, e.g. PCs of a particular power level equipped with standard magic items for their level should be able to take on monsters of a particular power level at a standard level of challenge. Maybe it could also explain how reducing magic item power will change the level of challenge if monster power remains constant, or how monster power can be adjusted to maintain the same level of challenge. However, I don't see the fact that such advice exists as "restrictive" or as "funnelling". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monte Cook: Guidance for Monsters and Treasure
Top